| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,497 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
507 Posts |
|
|
I recently received this stamp. There are two perfs on the top edge (circled in red) that look "short" to me. I was wondering what collective thought in regard to how this impacts its collectibility (i.e., would you put this stamp in your collection). Thanks. 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
I would depending on it's scarcity and wait for a nicer one to come along. I probably have some that look like that
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
5460 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
752 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
576 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2544 Posts |
|
|
I love debating affect versus effect - I vote for affect on this topic. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1565 Posts |
|
|
I agree with Peter. Some stamps; the classic Native issues of Portuguese India come to mind; can be difficult to find with full perfs due to stamps often being separated by scissors. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Climber Steve - 02/04/2018 3:38 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts |
|
|
In my opinion, the perforations are short...because these stamps are perf 14 horizontally. In this case, the stamps separate rather easily without "shorting" perforations. So a stamp with shorter perfs, like this one, is pretty noticeable.
With a gauge of perf 10 and lower, it is much easier to damage the perforations, so it is to be expected that you'll get a lot more shorter perforations. So. with a perf 10 stamp, shorter perforations would be expected. They would be more acceptable, especially on a stamp with soft paper.
Again,this is just my opinion.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by bookbndrbob - 02/04/2018 3:49 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12557 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts |
|
|
I see those perforations as OK, not short, as I believe "short" means less than 1/2 the average height of all the other perforations. I also look at a number of other factors to assess whether collectable or to keep, such as centering (very nice on this) and cancel (very light).
As to effect vs. affect, affect is a verb, which this is not, so effect it is.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by orstampman - 02/04/2018 4:28 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1047 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
363 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
|
|
I go with pascoe. Personally, that small difference wouldn't have any meaning for me but others would see it as a flaw. To each his own ! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Norway
1661 Posts |
|
|
Personally I keep any not-perfect stamp as a spacefiller until a better stamp comes around. Damaged stamps often only means it has served its purpose, and they can have nice postmarks etc, so in my mind the imperfect stamps are also part of postal history and deserves love and care as the others. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
|
|
Almost all of mine are space fillers if you define them that you'll replace them if better ones come along. Isn't that a universal method of collecting ? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1115 Posts |
|
|
I'd put in my album because of the centering which is really nice, but for me, I'd look for a replacement (no rush) because to my eyes, the two nibbed perfs disturb the symmetry / visual of the stamp. My eyes can't help but be pulled over to the short perfs instead of concentrating on the vignette, which I like to be foremost. Its all subjective of course, so if it floats yer boat, by all means keep and enjoy it, its still a nice example. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,497 |
|