Common sense would say to avoid sellers with low or negative feedback, but if there are very strong buyer protections in place, then perhaps there is no risk should a seller not send an item or send an item not as described. Is it because of the
ebay money back guarantee, that sellers with a higher than average amount of negative feedback are permitted to sell on
ebay?
I have had items not delivered or received not as described from 99% positive feedback sellers.
Sometimes high positive feedback sellers have a no reserve auctions where an item with a fair market value of $100 item has an opening bid of $19.99 and there are no bidders with 5 minutes left in the auction. If I were to successfully be the only bidder on 10 of these auctions and let's say out of 10 of these auctions, the item never ships in 7 of them, and I have to open a case for item not received on each one, then I sure hope there is generous limit on the amount of cases a buyer can open for item not received before there are restrictions placed on the buyer.
If
ebay is going to permit sellers with a lower than average percentage rate of positive feedback to sell on their site, then buyer protections should be generous if a buyer happens to buy from 3 low positive feedback sellers and endure an item not received or item not as described and then has to open 3 cases in a row for example.