| Author |
Replies: 3,765 / Views: 245,825 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1162 Posts |
|
|
stanshepp- I am curious - what color is the cancel claimed by the seller? I don't know that I would call it red. I don't know that I would call it orange. I KNOW I wouldn't call it yellow. It seems to be an amalgam of all these colors. So.... what would you call that??? It is a beautiful stamp - sharp impression and decent margins! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
Mootermutt, Sellers description:
USA 1851 Scott#10A used 3¢ BROWN RED w/red cancel cv:$160
I haven't plated it yet, but I bid on it as a very nice 11A, Purplish-Claret (approaching plum?) shade. 4-margins, top row, with an incredible impression.
I probably overpaid for it, but I really liked it.
Stan Shepp |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
BTW, I had to look up what color the seller called both the stamp and the cancel. I don't believe the seller had a clue about either.
She (Jessica?) has a variety of worldwide stamps for sale, some are very nice with certs, but this 3c was her only 3c Washington & it has no cert.
I dont think "Brown Red" is a very common color determination for this stamp either.
Stan |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
607 Posts |
|
|
Quote: USA 1851 Scott#10A used 3¢ BROWN RED w/red cancel cv:$160
I haven't plated it yet, but I bid on it as a very nice 11A, Purplish-Claret (approaching plum?) shade. 4-margins, top row, with an incredible impression. Hey Stan Shepp -- That stamp is position 7L2E -- note the very weak section of the LFL near its bottom -- which completely wore away when plate 2E was re-entered to become plate 2L -- resulting in a very distinct 4mm break in the LFL on position 7L2L. The color in the seller's scan is very unusual (at least on my monitor) -- likely not true to the actual color of the stamp (??) -- will be interested to see an updated scan once you have the stamp in hand. Regards // ioagoa |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by ioagoa - 08/17/2022 11:24 am |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
ioagoa,
7L2E it is! - and much nicer than the other 2 that I already have.
It is uncommon for an advertised #10/A to actually be a #10/A.
Stan Shepp |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
920 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
939 Posts |
|
|
Stanshepp, those are gorgeous folded covers and stamps.
I'm skeptical about the damaged stamp on the Salem cover in that there isn't any evidence of damage to the cover. And it doesn't appear that the ink is damaged either. It just looks funny to me.
Thanks for showing them. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
It is pretty well tied to the cover by the cancel. I am guessing that it was damaged prior to it being put on the cover. The sender just licked the corner piece and stuck it on as well.
I am guessing.
stan |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
607 Posts |
|
|
Hey Stan Shepp --
That unplated stamp on the cover with the MAR 15(?) Salem CDS is position 47L1L -- so a Scott # 11A.
Despite that damaged lower left corner -- the stamp clearly has 1 line recut in the LLT -- and IMO, the RIL runs down too far (although not far enough for Chase to classify it as such).
If the color looks OB -- then possibly could be EOB -- (although impossible to colorize a stamp from a scan).
Nice set of Salem cancels!
// ioagoa |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
342 Posts |
|
|
ioagoa,
Thanks! Not the first time Siegel mis-describes a stamp!
The color closely matches the other two, so probably/possibly EOB.
RIFL runs down too far in my book as well.
I appreciate your assistance.
Stan Shepp |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member

United States
79 Posts |
|
|
I picked up this cover with a batch of others at a recent auction. I believe the stamp is #11A. I know ID'ing colors digitally is a challenge, but would you guess this is "brownish carmine" or a sulfuretted red? I haven't tried my hand at plating thus far, but perhaps that would provide a better clue. The cover was postmarked in New Bedford, MA on October 22 maybe in 1852. That is the year penciled in on the inside of the cover, but I don't know if that is original. The cover was sent by Edward L. Baker, the treasurer of Wamsutta Mills located in New Bedford. Wamsutta Mills was founded in 1846 and is a going brand to this day. It is owned by Bed, Bath and Beyond. The recipient was the cotton merchant of Greenleaf & Hubbard in New Orleans, LA. Greenleaf & Hubbard was a short-lived firm; it was founded in 1851 and was dissolved in 1860 over the partners' political differences. James Greenleaf was a Union man, while his partner, Daniel Hubbard, was a Southerner through and through.   |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
607 Posts |
|
|
Hello Capthickey --
That stamp on your New Bedford, MA cover plates to position 23L3 -- which makes it a Scott #11A.
Regarding the color -- while it is almost impossible to ID colors from computer scans, I can tell you that your stamp is very sulphuretted -- so even with the stamp in hand (and with confirmed reference material for direct comparison) -- trying to ID its original color would most likely be a challenge.
Hope this helps a little.
Regards // ioagoa
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member

United States
79 Posts |
|
|
Thank you ioagoa. I appreciate the plating info, and you confirmed my suspicion regarding sulfuretting.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 3,765 / Views: 245,825 |
|