| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 5,644 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
I'm curious if someone knows the spotting features for checking out Cherifien Post stamps...I'll post a couple, and I'd appreciate any opinions on genuineness, if possible. Thanks in advance. Collin 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Definitely A7. On the first printing, the margins are much tighter and the printing is much coarser.
Looks genuine to me. I see no indication that it would be a fake/forgery. Is there a reason you would suspect it is a fake? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
K- You beat me to the followup, with one of each printing...  No particular reason to suspect a fake, other than its the kind of thing you'd expect to run across faked... Thanks! Collin |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
The only fakes you have to worry about are fake overprints, and also 1st sets made from altered 2nd sets (some poorly centered examples with dirty impressions are sometimes trimmed and reperfed). Your A2 looks genuine; you have the variety WITH the imprint. Thanks for the additional pic!  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
Never thought about the possibility of someone trimming down the second issue, but considering the difference in catalogue value, I should have considered that possibility.
Thanks for the followup.
Collin |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Usually, the finer impression on the 2nd printing is a dead giveaway for faked 1st printings.
However, not everybody has the stamps to compare. Also, Scott does not mention the difference in printing impressions. Narrow margins can be faked, and "white paper" is not the best of descriptors when the tinting is faint to begin with. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Collin, got any more? I don't have a complete set of scans for both sets.  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2664 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: you would be very dangerous if you went rougue. I have no interest in forging stamps, only in spotting them. It's an issue of protecting my time/money investment. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
4788 Posts |
|
|
The knowledge and expertise of the folks on this forum never ceases to amaze me. Well done. KirkS |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
K-
I might be able to put my hands on a couple more from the second printing...unfortunately, the A2 pictured is my only example from the first printing. If anyone has a set to post, please do so. I'd like to see it, too.
As much as I would like a complete set of the first printing, once I have representatives of each printing, I switch gears and only fill in gaps when I find them at very low prices. That is the case with most of the oddballs...I may never complete Castellorizo, or Foochow or Chefoo from the Treaty Ports, or Oltre Giuba, or Saseno, or the Czech Legion overprints, or any of a hundred other little guys; that still works for me, though. It might drive others crazy.
Collin |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
I don't have SG, sorry.
They do appear in the Ceres and in the recent Scott catalogs (I think last ~5 years only). When they first got a catalog number listing in Scott, it was at the front of French Morocco. But now the listings have been moved to the beginning of Morocco (not French Morocco).
The wide margin set was issued in Feb 1913. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 08/16/2012 03:01 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Kim, I think I have both Ceres and Scott I'll kick tyres.
Scott Index go to page 1121 Page 1121 go to Volume 4 Volume 4 = Nothing.
:(
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 08/16/2012 04:23 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts |
|
|
From Casper & Stefano - why they are not in SG:
"The Sherifian (Cherifien, or Cheriffien) post, an official post started in 1892, operated throughout Morocco and in Tangier. These stamps are not included in Gibbons because they are regarded as a local post issue, and Scott merely illustrates the design in Volume 2, French Morocco, between French Offices in Morocco and French Protectorate (p. 950 of 1999 catalogue). Before 1912 the covers were impressed with hand-struck cachets; on 25 May 1912 these were replaced with adhesive stamps of the type you illustrate, in six values (1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 mouzounats, or "moussonats"), with narrow margins. In February 1913 the same denominations were issued in modified colours, with wide margins. Your stamp is from this second issue. On 1 October, 1913, the Sherifian posts were merged with the French PTT operating in Morocco, but these stamps remained in use all over Morocco until 1915 and in Tangier until 1919. David Heppell (05 Jun 2000)" |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 5,644 |
|