Quote:
Now what as not been mention in this current fraudulent go around is that such material is very collectible, especially if used on cover. It is all catalogue listed by Scott and often priced. Such is not quite as obvious as it was since the counterfeit listing were moved to a stand alone, Scott Specialized Catalogue of United States Counterfeits, being removed from the Scott US Specialized Catalogue. Should such a publication be illegal, first amendment be ignored, as it may invite folks to, BUY NOT USE, fake stamps?
(emphasis added)
Candidly, the percent of counterfeit stamp sales as a result of this is likely to be a tiny fraction of one percent of all counterfeit stamp sales. Stamp collector interest in counterfeit stamp just doesn't the move the needle compared to the amount being sold to actually be used.
I also disagree that these counterfeits used on cover have any appreciable market value. If you look that the Scott listings for them, not only are there a myriad of them for any given stamp type, but they are not differentiated well in Scott at all. I find it highly unlikely that this will be a collecting focus for any major segment of the collector base.
NOTE: I am talking strictly about the current Forever stamp counterfeit stamps. Counterfeit stamps on cover which predate the Forever era are quite collectible, primarily because we weren't overrun with them.