While there is little to no chance that the industry will adopt a new system, you are welcome to categorize and grade your own stamps in any way that you like for your own inventory.
The problem with a singular numeric score as others have pointed out is that it aggregates and dilutes all the condition factors into a single linear grade, mostly focused on centering.
If you want to use a 5 point score, how about making it a three-part score with 555 being a top score. For mint stamps, the first digit is centering, the second digit is gum, and the 3rd digit is everything else.
For gum, you could use something like: 5=NH 4=NH but gum skips or other minor blemishes 3=LH 2=hinged or disturbed gum 1=HR 0=NG
The 3rd digit represents any faults or other condition anomalies. 5=sound 4=nibbled perf, tiny corner crease, perf crease, etc. 3=pulled perf, minor thin, crease 2=small tear, multiple pulled perfs, heavy crease 1=torn in half and repaired 0=parts of stamp are missing Multiple problems drop it down a notch (pulled perf and thin knock it down from a 3 to a 2).
To summarize, a well centered, LH, stamp with a tiny corner crease would get a score of 534.
For used stamps, the middle digit would represent the quality of the cancellation rather than the quality of the gum. 5=light, clear, face-free cancellation 4=fairly light but smudgy cancel etc.
I have not (and will not) use such a system myself, but if you are so inclined to inventory your own collection in such a way, it is some food for thought. |