Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

How To Use The Stamp Condition System I Invented

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,183Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1055 Posts
Posted 12/24/2024   9:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ZebraMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
While there is little to no chance that the industry will adopt a new system, you are welcome to categorize and grade your own stamps in any way that you like for your own inventory.

The problem with a singular numeric score as others have pointed out is that it aggregates and dilutes all the condition factors into a single linear grade, mostly focused on centering.

If you want to use a 5 point score, how about making it a three-part score with 555 being a top score. For mint stamps, the first digit is centering, the second digit is gum, and the 3rd digit is everything else.

For gum, you could use something like:
5=NH
4=NH but gum skips or other minor blemishes
3=LH
2=hinged or disturbed gum
1=HR
0=NG

The 3rd digit represents any faults or other condition anomalies.
5=sound
4=nibbled perf, tiny corner crease, perf crease, etc.
3=pulled perf, minor thin, crease
2=small tear, multiple pulled perfs, heavy crease
1=torn in half and repaired
0=parts of stamp are missing
Multiple problems drop it down a notch (pulled perf and thin knock it down from a 3 to a 2).

To summarize, a well centered, LH, stamp with a tiny corner crease would get a score of 534.

For used stamps, the middle digit would represent the quality of the cancellation rather than the quality of the gum.
5=light, clear, face-free cancellation
4=fairly light but smudgy cancel
etc.

I have not (and will not) use such a system myself, but if you are so inclined to inventory your own collection in such a way, it is some food for thought.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
641 Posts
Posted 12/24/2024   9:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Captain Stamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the advices ! That helps !
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 05/18/2025   1:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Snopes to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you, ZebraMan for this breakdown on damage:

The 3rd digit represents any faults or other condition anomalies.
5=sound
4=nibbled perf, tiny corner crease, perf crease, etc.
3=pulled perf, minor thin, crease
2=small tear, multiple pulled perfs, heavy crease
1=torn in half and repaired
0=parts of stamp are missing
Multiple problems drop it down a notch (pulled perf and thin knock it down from a 3 to a 2).

I have long been using basically this system to decide whether to keep a stamp, to put it in my big "damaged stamps" box, or to throw it away.

For modern, low value stamps (below $5CV), I will keep only a 5 or a 4 and will replace the 4 whenever I get a chance.

For older or HV stamps, I might keep a 3 or even in very rare cases a 2, but will make an annotation in my album as to the extent of the damage.

It's useful to have this scale spelled out.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,183Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05