Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Stamps & Postal History Can Once Again Be Imported To The United States Of America Tariff Free

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 31 / Views: 2,829Next Topic
Page: of 3
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/19/2025   4:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rogdcam to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Just received this from HR Harmer/Corinphila:


Quote:
Update Regarding the US Tariffs on Philatelic Material
The new tariffs that came into effects several months ago, and which affected philatelic material, they have now reached a changed status: Stamps & Postal History can once again be imported to the United States of America tariff free, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) 9704. This is really good news for all our customers in the USA.
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
297 Posts
Posted 11/19/2025   4:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Neeskens13 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, Rog. This is great news. I just won a bunch of material yesterday at the Felzmann auction in Germany and was dreading having to pay an extra 15% (or whatever the rate was).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4276 Posts
Posted 11/19/2025   6:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Just received this from HR Harmer/Corinphila:


Well rodgcam, that is nice news, from a dealer, it does not the real question as explained here:

Quote:
After close consultation with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) over the past several weeks, the Boston 2026 Organizing Committee is pleased to announce that stamps and covers are, once again, tariff free for entry into the US. Specifically, the initial ruling letter that resulted in philatelic tariffs has now been ruled void ab initio (i.e., null from the beginning) and voided. A new ruling letter holding that philatelic material covered by HTSUS 9704 is again tariff free will be issued by the CBP in the next few weeks.
(See:https://goscf.com/t/90399 )

So has the promised new guidance letter actually been issued? If so lets see it here. Until then it is still wishful thinking, not in black and white.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4276 Posts
Posted 11/19/2025   6:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The latest HTS update (2025 HTS, revision 29) for category 9704 and like materials:

https://hts.usitc.gov/search?query=9704.00.00.00


Yes rodgcam covered this elsewhere. But, of course the link is not producing the letter.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Parcelpostguy - 11/19/2025 6:55 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
848 Posts
Posted 11/19/2025   10:34 pm  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add paperhistory to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The letter is https://rulings.cbp.gov/ruling/H354294.

It's helpful, but doesn't completely rule out IEPPA tariffs or other things (the new letter replaces an earlier letter that asserted that stamps were not qualified for the "informational materials" tariff exception). Stamps should fit with within the informational materials exception for IEPPA....

Ultimately it's sufficiently complex that we can all expect some continued confusion and uneven applications and decisionmaking....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   12:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What is complex? The HTS value for these materials is "FREE". IF everyone actually looks at the schedule there should not be problems. You can lead an ass to water……
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
719 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   08:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stamps101 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Rog, this is great news!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   11:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1052 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   2:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ZebraMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is wonderful to see an official letter of clarification from CBP. Thank you rogdcam.

I hope it is the final word, but I don't think that this clarifies anything. There are two points that are left ambiguous.

First, to clarify the distinction between 4907 and 9704, the author writes under "Law and Analysis", "Only unused U.S. postage or first day covers of current or new issue are valid as postage for correspondence originating in the U.S., and as such articles are classified under heading 4907, HSUS. Conversely, unused foreign postage is invalid for payment of postage in the United States. These stamps and the like are of value philately to stamp collectors, and are properly classified under heading 9704, HTSUS, which appears in the section of the HTSUS that provides for Works of Art, Collectors' Pieces, and Antiques."

There are so many things wrong with the boldfaced statement describing section 4907.
- Old, antique, classic, and vintage stamps are also valid for postage. It is not true that only current or new issue stamps are valid for postage.
- First Day Covers are not valid as postage. The stamps have already been cancelled. Also 4907 says nothing about first day covers.
- Nothing in 4907 says that 4907 only applies to U.S. postage. The section of 4907 quoted in his letter says, "Unused postage, revenue or similar stamps of current or new issue in the country in which they have, or will have, a recognized face value". The section is not limited to stamps "that have a face value in the U.S.", instead it includes, I believe, all stamps (and currency etc) with a negotiable face value in the country of origin, which may be the US, or may be China.

While the conclusion is correct, that old unused collectible stamps are covered under section 9704, the author's analysis of the law I believe is incorrect, and that slabs of unused modern foreign postage would be classified as 4907, which is contrary to the author's reasoning.


Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the letter does not clarify whether or not the new blanket retaliatory tariffs apply to duty free items or not. Specifically the author writes, for heading 9704, "The 2025 column one, general rate of duty is Free. This ruling does not address the applicability of any additional duties, fees, taxes, extractions, or other charges, which may apply to the goods discussed herein. This includes, but is not limited to, tariffs and other duties as provided for in Subchapter III to Chapter 99, HTSUS ..."

The additional Chapter 99 and/or Section 301 tariffs are added per country above and beyond the base rate for a category. For some time this was 15% but could be from 7.5% to 125%, regardless of HTS category.

If Chapter 99 did not apply to "Duty Free" items, the author would have stated so. Instead, he clearly added a disclaimer that additional tariffs may apply to any imported item, regardless of the category-specific rates.


Lastly, this letter only applies to a few specifically identified items from two countries. While it could logically be extrapolated to other items and countries, other specific circumstances may vary and handing this letter to the FedEx driver who has come knocking on my door to collect a tariff may not do any good. I am looking forward to the full guidance letter that the Boston officials received, which I expect will be signed by someone of higher rank than the Chief of Chemicals, Petroleum, Metals, and Miscellaneous Articles Branch.

Again, thanks rogdcam for posting the letter, it is a step in the right direction, and I look forward to more comprehensive letters to follow.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   2:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I posted this from the APS in another topic. It addresses the other tariffs or lack thereof.




Quote:
The new letter is silent on the issue of whether stamps are informational materials or not, qualifying for the Berman Amendment's exemption for informational materials.The last paragraph refers to Chapter 99 but does not appear to provide guidance on this matter.


Informal guidance from CBP supervisors continues to refer collectors to the CBP FAQ which notes that HTS heading 9704 items may be considered informational materials. The suggestion then is that philatelic material can enter the US under one of four exemption codes for informational material as follows:

Mexican origin material : 9903.01.03

Canadian origin material : 9903.01.12

Chinese origin material : 9903.01.22

All other origin material : 9903.01.31

Collectors who have instructed their overseas vendors to include the HTS code 9903.01.31 in addition to the traditional 9704.00.0000 code are reportedly now successfully receiving their purchases without the assessment of tariffs. Based on all available evidence, this approach should work.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1326 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   7:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrewM to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's very confusing. Even this thread makes that clear.

You may have noticed for months ebay posted a heading on foreign stamp listings warning that U.S. customs duties will apply. How much those duties would be is not spelled out. Apparently, it was anyone's guess. Whether a tariff even applied to stamps was unclear. A lot of stamp purchases can be mailed in a small business envelope, so how would such a policy even work? Would it end up being a tariff on all incoming mail? Would the mail have to be opened and inspected? Some countries even said they would hold back all mail to the U.S. as a result of this. I've never seen anything like this except maybe in wartime. Are we at war? What is going on?

Even more confusing was ebay's attempt to deal with this: If you agreed to purchase an item from a foreign seller it would be without knowing the cost of the tariff -- because ebay did not know. And the foreign seller did not know, either. But, whatever that tariff was, you were still committed to buy the item, according to ebay's rules. Would anyone commit to buying a car without knowing all the additional "fees" they had to pay? No sane person would do business this way -- but we were expected to.

When the tariff policy appeared on ebay listings, I was buying from foreign dealers. We came to agreements to cancel some of those purchases. Had they not agreed, apparently ebay would still have expected me to pay the foreign seller the full amount without dispute. Some foreign sellers even told me they would no longer sell to Americans due to the complete lack of clarity about U.S. tariffs.

No one can do business this way.The ebay policy is not so much to blame. After all, it came from the unclear and confusing federal tariff policy. Every buyer and seller had to guess what the rules were. It was a very poorly-planned, very unclear policy that buyers, foreign sellers, and ebay could never quite figure out.

It was so unclear, it led a number of countries to simply stop sending small packages to the U.S. out of frustration. If you can even imagine that sort of "embargo" on the U.S. That included stamp materials. A number of foreign dealers told me they were no longer selling to the U.S. until this was all straightened out. We were on the same "do not ship" list as North Korea! Who operates this way?

Now apparently tariffs on stamps no longer apply? I just checked various foreign stamp items on ebay, and I don't see that warning about U.S. import tariffs on stamps anymore. So maybe it is gone? But maybe it will come back again? Tariffs come and go and come back again -- lately -- so you do never know. Or maybe I'll wake up from this dream and find things operating like normal international business. It does feel like Alice in Wonderland as if the Mad Hatter were running things.

It's certainly the most confusing on-again-off-again trade nonsense I've ever seen. And it initially caused problems for next year's big stamp show in Boston by discouraging some foreign dealers from even showing up. Would the enormous numbers of stamps they "imported" to the U.S. be tariffed? Apparently, no one knew. Will that problem now disappear? Will foreign dealers show up as normal? Or is it too late for many of them?

It's the silliest on-again, off-again foreign trade policy I've ever seen. It also may all have been unconstitutional for a president to do this much damage. He does not even appear to have this power except in a national "emergency". Congress has the power over "all bills for raising revenue," not the President. I hope now stamp collectors -- of all innocent people -- can go back to buying and selling without federal intervention. Wake me in three years when this confusing nonsense is finally over.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by DrewM - 11/20/2025 8:20 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4276 Posts
Posted 11/20/2025   10:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Informal guidance


I am adding the emphasis to rodgcam's quote from the APS. Again folks are jumping for joy based upon INFORMAL information. Kind of spending you lottery wins before you by the ticket.

ZebraMan's most recent post above.


DrewM, the POTUS' actions have not been ruled upon by SCOTUS. If ruled as being within the powers and authority of the POTUS then the party to blame for the disruption is the small company which started it all because they were upset it affect the price of all the China made trinkets they sold here in the USA which were now no longer competitive with similar trinkets make in the USA. Now when the matter is settled, exercising one's right to sue, can have unintended consequences far beyond your personal desires or it can have profound effects internationally just as you desired to create. Be that as it may, it is the reason the cage of the 800 pound gorilla was kicked.

For good or for bad philately, and specifically Boston 2026, are collateral damage until the matter is truly settled. However putting out pronouncement about what has not yet been written is at best, wishful thinking bordering on hubris.

When the dust settles, will the suing companies be better off? They got free legal expenses to SCOTUS, will same be offered for bankruptcy expenses? I do not see how they will survive no matter the outcome of the case. Likewise no matter the outcome the opinion will be an interesting and informative read.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/21/2025   12:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Wake me in three years when this confusing nonsense is finally over.


Exactly how 77 million American's felt about the previous four years.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10585 Posts
Posted 11/21/2025   07:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A LOT of them don't feel that way now. They have discovered just how much of a ride they got taken on.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12551 Posts
Posted 11/21/2025   1:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Right
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10585 Posts
Posted 11/21/2025   2:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I know. I pay attention.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 31 / Views: 2,829Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05