Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

New Rule - Postmark Doesn't Necessarily Reflect The Date USPS First Accepted Possession Of The Mail

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 1,609Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   02:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Prexie3c to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
From CNN (https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/31/...in-ballots):

Quote:

Ballots, tax returns and other important mail may not get postmarked the day you turn it in, Postal Service warns.

If you rely on postmarks when casting your ballot, filing your taxes or paying bills, a new US Postal Service rule makes it clear that you should plan ahead.

Postmarks – which include a date stamp from the USPS – can offer proof that a piece of mail, such as a ballot, was turned in by a legal deadline.

But the new rule, which went into effect last week, clarifies that a postmark does not "necessarily" reflect the date the USPS "first accepted possession" of the piece of mail.

That's because most postmarks are applied at regional mail-processing hubs, and the USPS has undertaken a major overhaul that includes eliminating multiple daily trips between post office locations and those facilities.

As a result, people in some parts of the country – particularly in rural areas far away from regional processing hubs – can experience delays between dropping off their mail and having it postmarked.

The Postal Service said it has not changed its postmarking practices but issued the new rule to make clear to the public what a postmark denotes.

Voting by mail grew more widespread during the pandemic and made up about 30% of the turnout in the 2024 election, according to federal data. That's down from a high of about 43% in 2020. Currently, 14 states – including the presidential battleground of Nevada – accept regular mailed ballots received after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before that day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The changes at the Postal Service – and the potential impact on mail ballots – come against the backdrop of President Donald Trump's drive to sharply curtail mail-in voting. He has railed against the practice as rife with fraud, despite no evidence of widespread wrongdoing.

An executive order the president signed in March sought to mandate changes to mail-in balloting and other election practices, but has been blocked, in part, by the courts. In 2025, four states – Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio and Utah – eliminated their grace periods for counting mailed ballots received after Election Day.

The ultimate fate of late-arriving ballots likely rests with the US Supreme Court. The justices will decide this term whether states may count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, in a Republican-led case. It originated with a challenge to a Mississippi law enacted during the pandemic that allows ballots to be received up to five days after the election.

This year, election officials have sought to alert voters to their concerns about late-arriving mail ballots.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta cited the USPS changes to exhort voters who live more than 50 miles away from USPS mail-processing hubs to cast their ballots early ahead of a November special election on redistricting. Similarly, in Oregon – the first state to adopt a universal vote-by-mail system – Secretary of State Tobias Read warned voters that ballots that were mailed in after October 30 might not receive a postmark in time for the November 4 election.

Tess Seger, a spokesperson for Read, said Oregon officials "plan to continue to raise awareness about this issue" ahead of next year's elections.

The Postal Service has long recommended that voters mail their completed ballots at least a week before they must be received by their local election offices.

In a statement sent to CNN this week, the Postal Service said that any customer who wants to ensure that a piece of mail receives a postmark can take it to a Post Office retail counter and request a manual postmark. Customers also have the option of using certified or registered mail, for a fee.



More details on the new rule here ---> https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...ssession#h-9

Things are surely getting more complicated. Not just mail-in voting - tax filings, insurance claims, payments are also affected. I expect potential significant legal ramifications. Good read here on the risks this new rule poses for institutions that depend on postmark-based deadlines ---> https://www.brookings.edu/articles/...cks-mailing/
Send note to Staff
Edited by Prexie3c - 01/01/2026 02:08 am

Bedrock Of The Community
12591 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   08:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The USPS is a shadow of itself and needs to be gutted or privatized. This past year they have "lost" our First Class mail several times including a substantial check, bank statements, insurance paperwork etc. You see the mail images on Informed Delivery but the items never show up. Missing mail search requests are laughable. The last debacle involved the USPS trying to deliver an Amazon package to us from 25 miles away. Nine days after it left the processing facility to travel the 25 miles to our doorstep it pops up back at an Amazon facility. Trust the USPS with ballots or prescription drugs?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   12:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Relaxation and preferential of hiring standards of the past years at the USPS is much to blame, but that cannot be said out loud in the mainstream press.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10667 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   2:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Obviously anything to kill voting……some seem to love that idea.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5097 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   2:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Obviously anything to kill voting……some seem to love that idea.

Agree, but now it appears that this will also affect many other things, as listed by the OP. Sometimes our leaders don't really think through the implications ... or maybe they do, and just don't care.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10667 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   2:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Clearly it will have a negative affect in many areas. But the blame does not belong on the PO; they are just following orders. The blame belongs on those giving the orders, and they are mostly incompetent and keep proving it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   4:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Obviously anything to kill voting…


Not at all, just set the rational rule that all ballots must be turned in to the Registrar of Voters by the in person vote termination date and time. Not to mention VBM ballots can be turned in without actually being mailed. That is why VBM ballots go out weeks or longer earlier that the "day of voting."

Then there is no issue with a dated postmark needed nor is there any political spin needed.

Also, BRM (business reply mail) was not needed to be postmarked per USPOD and USPS policy. Just because third parties demanded a postmark on BRM, does mean the third parties should get their way. The first step to educe te issue is to send out the VBM return envelopes pre-stamped with an adhesive. Can't use a meter as those are supposed to be undated for the return envelopes.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1116 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   8:23 pm  Show Profile Check docgfd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add docgfd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
One thing to keep in mind here is that its been several years since the local post offices have been cancelling received mail, this now a function of the various distribution centers, so I suspect not all mail gets postmarked on the day it was mailed (dependent on the timing of mail getting into the trucks at the local PO's). If a postmark is needed to prove a mailing date, the item can always be presented directly at your PO for a hand cancel, albeit that being an inconvenience,
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10667 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   8:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's a clear attempt to kill mail in voting. Which, it should be remembered, goes back to the beginning of the nation. Mail in voting worked for electing George Washington, and thousands of other officials of every party this country has ever had.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   10:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Prexie3c to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:

One thing to keep in mind here is that its been several years since the local post offices have been cancelling received mail, this now a function of the various distribution centers, so I suspect not all mail gets postmarked on the day it was mailed (dependent on the timing of mail getting into the trucks at the local PO's). If a postmark is needed to prove a mailing date, the item can always be presented directly at your PO for a hand cancel, albeit that being an inconvenience,


From the tax folks (https://nstp.org/article/usps-annou...ate-system):

Ensuring a Postmark on the Date of Delivery: To assure a postmark is applied on the same day a document is delivered to the USPS, individuals must utilize specific retail services. The final rule outlines the following methods:

- Request a Manual Postmark: Customers may present a mail piece at a retail counter and request a "manual (local) postmark". This postmark is applied at the time of acceptance, so the date aligns with the date the USPS took possession.

- Postage Validation Imprint (PVI): When a customer pays for postage at a retail counter, the PVI label applied by the employee also indicates the date of acceptance.

- Certificates of Mailing: Customers may purchase a Certificate of Mailing, or use Registered or Certified Mail, to obtain a receipt that serves as evidence of the date the item was presented for mailing

This change in USPS processes will have a potentially significant impact on tax filings. IRC §7502 specifically relies upon the postmark date applied to an envelope to determine timely filing if the document is not physically delivered to the IRS office by the due date for such document.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10667 Posts
Posted 01/01/2026   10:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
April 15 is a secondary problem, but the powers that be have already proved that they don't care about that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6445 Posts
Posted 01/02/2026   4:17 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If the time/date when USPS takes possession is important, you request a handstamp over the counter for untracked mail. Hasn't this always been the case?

These days, If I send something where I need to be able to prove when I sent it, I typically will send it via a tracked method and insist upon an acceptance scan receipt at the counter. I don't just dump stuff on the counter, in a drop box, or leave it for carrier pickup.

I would never send a tax return, legal or financial documents, etc., via 1st class letter. That's just asking for problems.

It's not that hard.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by revenuecollector - 01/02/2026 4:19 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1854 Posts
Posted 01/02/2026   5:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The rule sounds to me like increasing transparency, which is what liberals are always howling to have. It's never surprising that they throw a tantrum when a common-sense rule exposes their vectors of fraud. Apparently none is capable of advance planning. I voted by mail in California for years between 1985 and 2010, and everyone knew you mailed it in 10 days before the deadline if you wanted it counted. And you received the ballot two months before Election Day, sometimes three months. It is only since about 2014 that professional ballot brokers have begun to distort the system, so a response by those who want integrity in the system is natural.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10667 Posts
Posted 01/02/2026   5:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I am all for transparency. But the PO had no problem with dating things the day that they were picked up for many decades. With high volume and antiquated equipment. A sudden change (even if a few years ago) that can have a negative impact on elections is certainly suspicious under the current circumstances. I can't imagine why anyone would think it a good idea, or a better situation.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1854 Posts
Posted 01/02/2026   8:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No sudden change occurred. They are just stating by rule what has been true for years. Because the distribution centers mentioned in the rule and the reports have been online for more than a decade. When I ran a law firm in the 2010s in San Jose, all our mail was trucked to the distribution center in northern Santa Barbara County and canceled there, a day or two later. USPS closed its Nor Cal processing centers years earlier.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1164 Posts
Posted 01/07/2026   08:57 am  Show Profile Check 3193zd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 3193zd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree cjpalermo1964 this will only will help by clarifying a current situation that many might not have understood that this policy has been in place for sometime. I ship every day time sensitive items and we have to insist that when they pick up, they scan or else it can be days before they do, not just overnight. Extremely frustrating when a customer is looking for tracking and USPS doesn't put in the system for 2-3 days especially when its supposed to be there in 2-3 days.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Michael Darabaris
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 1,609Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05