Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Working On An Offline Collection

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Replies: 18 / Views: 745Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
Netherlands
6 Posts
Posted Today  1 Hr 35 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add REF-Foundry to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow, this is absolute gold, thank you so much, everyone! This is exactly the kind of deep, real-world insight no developer can figure out from behind a desk without talking to real collectors.

A few specific takeaways that I am immediately incorporating:

The Scott Sorting Order nuance (@ZebraMan):
That point about standard alphanumeric sorting breaking down with philatelic numbering (599A having to follow 599b, and JQ following Q) is brilliant. Standard database collation completely wrecks catalog order here. Adding a dedicated, customizable sort_order field (pre-filled with the catalog number but fully overridable) solves this cleanly without forcing rigid sorting rules that fail on edge cases.

Keyboard-First Workflow & Tabbing (@ZebraMan):
Loud and clear on the UI! Reaching for the mouse every three seconds during a long cataloging session is pure friction. All dropdowns and date pickers will fully support tab-navigation and quick typing to select, so your hands never have to leave the home row.

Avoiding 60-Field Clutter & Free-form Descriptions:
I completely agree that facing 60 empty boxes is exhausting. The goal is to keep the default entry clean and modular (collapsible field groups), anchored around a Short Description (for quick duplicate disambiguation like "Baltimore cancel") and a generous Long Description where you can simply paste the exact auction or dealer write-up without having to click ten different dropdowns.

Multiple Catalog IDs & Varieties:
The example of the Russia collection illustrates perfectly why forcing a single catalog field fails. International and specialty collecting requires side-by-side identifiers (e.g. Scott # + Michel / Specialized #) so varieties that carry high premiums aren't lost in translation.

Sub-collections & Topicals (@angore):
Having clean separation between a master inventory and topical/thematic sub-sets (like that Christmas collection example) without messy duplicate data is a great architectural pointer.

Thank you all for taking the time to write such detailed responses, this is shaping CollectRef into something genuinely useful rather than just another generic spreadsheet clone!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6646 Posts
Posted Today  40 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
From what I've observed so far, North America seems heavily centered around the Scott catalog and numeric grading/slabs (like PSE 1–100), whereas European collectors seem to rely much more on Michel / NVPH / Stanley Gibbons, paper certificates (BPP, NVPH), and subtle varieties like watermarks, perforations, and back-of-stamp expertizer marks (Prüfzeichen).

As an experienced collector (and fellow Dutch member!), how does that fundamental difference affect the way you personally track your collection compared to US collectors? Are there specific parameters or workflows where North American-oriented software completely misses the mark for European material?


Catalogues are regional. And there will be differences. Because most members here are from North America (European members are few and most disappear quit quickly) there is a strong orientation on Scott. Consequently, I noticed references to Scott for European stamps that are incorrect. But you will find that Michel, Yvert, and Stanley Gibbons, frequently, will not coincide.

European collectors tend to focus on countries, sometimes including their colonies. Worldwide collecting is much more popular in North America. In Europe, it is more common for people to use local catalogues. But even worldwide collectors in Europe use other catalogues: the UK uses Stanley Gibbons, Belgium, France and Southwest Europe Yvert and most of Europe uses Michel. When I was a child, Yvert was more common than Michel in the Netherlands. That changed.

Issue dates may not coincide. But colours are a plague. Even Scott and Stanley Gibbons use different colours.

Grading is something that is mostly an American hobby. However, something similar but less numerical like Fine / Vey Fine / Superb is highly common in the UK. Edifil will quote prices for well-centred stamp sets in addition to the standard prices that tend to be for "very fine" stamps or better. Encapsulating is considered hilarious in Europe, but is not much of a thing with serious US collectors either.

Perforation gauges are another issue. It could be because one catalogue uses quarter perforations, when another uses half perforations. And sometimes, a single catalogue will not update older listings.

If you look at LastDodo, you will see the utter mess with many variaties that never have existed, just because everyone uses another catalogue. I collect permanent stamps of the Estado Espaņol era. This mess is a reason I will not use that site for my collection. In fact, I never use any site or app, as none caters for my specialised collections.

Another point is the definition of stamp and postage stamp. Strictly speaking, postage due labels and telegraph stamps are not postage stamps. Very few catalogues ignore postage due labels. In some countries, telegraph stamps could, even if temporary, be used to prepay postage. Fiscal stamps are another such area.

What do you do with local carriage labels? I mean the real ones, not the fantasy stamps. And how about the sand dunes, where nudity is a taboo and people should not be depicted in any way, but that issued many stamps with people, scarcely dressed women and nude paintings, but that never saw any use or at least not in the country itself?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6646 Posts
Posted Today  36 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Multiple Catalog IDs & Varieties:
The example of the Russia collection illustrates perfectly why forcing a single catalog field fails. International and specialty collecting requires side-by-side identifiers (e.g. Scott # + Michel / Specialized #) so varieties that carry high premiums aren't lost in translation.


If you look deeper, you may find many stamps listed by one catalogue but not by others. Alternatively, stamps may be mixed up.
In the UK Wildings sets, three stamps changed their colours intentionally: the 2d, 4d, and 6d. Not all catalogues list all three.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Replies: 18 / Views: 745Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05