| Author |
Replies: 128 / Views: 17,639 |
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
A fairly pertinent post Rohumpy, there is just one other consideration, a nice stamp, decently hinged may have an album life of say 50 years. That same stamp with a journey from packet to packet may not survive. Certainly a mount is the highest order for preservation, but for the masses of stamps that fill a mediocre interest with part time collectors stored in less than favourable conditions, the hinged stamp in a well protected album, does have a role to play.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
220 Posts |
|
|
That .20c stamp that you hinge to be economical, may be worth a considerable amount in 25 to 50 years when they are passed on to son, daughter, or grandkids. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
|
|
I use mounts for all of my mint and most of my used stamps. I do continue to hinge used stamps in my general WW albums. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
I agree that at least some preservation will have been practiced with hinging over "glassine hopping" and I also agree with 'lockemup' that with a keen eye the more potentially valuable ones should be mounted. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts |
|
|
True Fred, those Dennisons are tasty. As I said, I don't use them anymore, but I have an old pack left over, and I keep them in a bowl on my desk, and I snack on then all day long.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
278 Posts |
|
|
if the stamp is around 5-10 cents I use "removable tape" it works good for me (some people will differ) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
Agree, Rod. I had rather have a stamp hinged into a protected album than tossed into a plastic box or glassines and let them rattle around in a box. THere is no easy answer. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2952 Posts |
|
|
I'd like to comment one more time on this subject. First, a history lesson on one of our most prized commemorative sets .. Quote: ... Over 2 billion stamps, whose total face value exceeded $40 million, were printed by the American Bank Note Company.
Opinion regarding the Columbian Issue at the time was mixed. The set sold well and did not face the sort of criticism that led to the withdrawal of the 1869 Pictorial Issue. However, approval was not universal. An organization called the Society for the Suppression of Spurious Stamps was created in protest over the creation of this set, deeming the Exposition in Chicago insufficiently important to be honored on postage, while some collectors balked at the Post Office Department's willingness to profit from the growing hobby of philately. The Columbians did not immediately increase in value after being removed from sale, in part due to substantial speculation resulting in a glut of stamps on the secondary market. I'd like to remind everyone that postal services globally have seen a huge downturn in business (obviously due to electronic communication) over the past 15 years. In addition to this downturn, post offices are using more and more to bar-coded labels, thus further reducing the number of postage stamps printed. What's the average run size on US commemoratives, lately? Keeping this in mind, do you honestly believe that those modern stamps you are hinging today are not worth the time and effort to preserve? Barring some great electronic catastrophe that ends the Internet forever, we will never see stamps issued in the same numbers as they were pre WWII. I'm not preserving stamps for myself. I'm preserving them for future generations ... Brian |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Rileysan - 05/04/2011 3:57 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
661 Posts |
|
|
To be honest, yes, I don't think most modern stamps are worth the effort to stick on a letter, the USPS has been raping collectors for decades, releasing an absurd number of stamps per year, hoping to make money off of completists. That's fine, I stopped playing their game in 1993, I no longer collect new issues and never will again.
I'm also not collecting for future generations, I couldn't care less if my kids decide to burn my various collections after I'm dead, I'll be dead, why will I care?
However, I am collecting, I am not simply accumulating. As such, my point in collecting is to get a complete set of whatever I happen to be buying, kept in pristine condition as much as humanly possible. Not that there's anything wrong with doing it another way, this is simply how I choose to collect. As such, I do not hinge, as hinging changes the condition of the stamp, whether mint or used. Cost is not an issue, hence I use the best quality mounts I can in pursuit of my enjoyment of my hobby.
Other people's mileage may vary. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1225 Posts |
|
|
This topic started out with a simple question of to hinge ot not to hinge and the response far exceeded my expectations and provided answers that are varied from one end to the other of the scale.
Me, I use Scott strip mounts of various sizes and cut them to length. I started using mounts due primarily because early in my hobby I purchased a Harris U.S. Classic album that had all the stamps removed and only the mounts were left. My 1st album was a Liberty album and I used hinges. I liked the look of the Harris album much more than the Liberty and transferred my humble collection over to the Harris. MNH or a used space filler, it gets put inside a mount. To me, this make the collection as a whole look better and I have never had an issue with a stamp falling out of a mount. I did have issues with hinges, for what ever reasons. In closing, it really doesn't make much difference what you use as long as the collector is happy with the way his or her stamps are mounted. Even not mounting your stamps, putting them in stock pages and leaving them there is OK. Its your collection, do it your way.
Art |
Send note to Staff
|
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (The exact & entire wording of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
That's life, that's what all the people say. You're mounting high in April, Hinging down in May But I know I'm gonna change that tune, When I'm back on top, back on top in June.
I said that's life, and as funny as it may seem Some people get their kicks, Stamping with Mint Unhinged But I don't let it, let it get me down, 'Cause this fine ol' world it keeps spinning around
I've seen a soaker, a sticker, a cindy, a cover, A President and a King. I've been up and down and over and out And I know one thing: Each time I find myself, flat on my face, I pick my tongs up, and get back in the race.
That's life......... (refrain)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2952 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
I realize this response is very dependent upon what you collect, how much you collect, and how you wish to display your stamps (i.e. in an album or stockbook) but to apply some simple math:
If you figure you can comfortably put perhaps 4 or 6 stamps in a row in a quality stockbook that has 6 rows per page and 20 pages, a $20 or $25 investment in a stockbook (or pages and a binder, if you prefer) will store between 480 and 720 stamps.
On the other hand, the most economical stamp mounts would cost at least 5 cents apiece. You would then have to buy between $24 and $36 in stamp mounts to mount the same number of stamps in an album ... and that doesn't include the cost of the empty album. So the stockbook method can actually be cheaper and would give you the flexibility to move your stamps around at will.
Of course none of these methods are as cheap as the lowly stamp hinge ... but admittedly they don't protect the stamp in the same way. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by wt1 - 05/09/2011 11:45 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Rileysan..I think we have uncovered another Sinatra fan Quote: none of these methods are as cheap as the lowly stamp hinge Lowly?....lowly! The Hinge Rules, Sir! Yes I mounted James 100 Cuba this morning, took about an hour and a half, Cost?......$1  Looks great, lovely tactile feel to the pages.My Cuba collection just tipped over the 1000. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
That's quite a group of answers. I guess I will just do it MY WAY.  choose the ones I want mounted or hinged. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jhlovell - 05/09/2011 7:52 pm |
|
Replies: 128 / Views: 17,639 |
|