Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Revenue ID Help Again Please

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 4,222Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 09/01/2011   01:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod, I'm not entirely sure they belong among 'Revenues'. The archaic script in the horseshoe is a severe pain in the nether regions, but I see a character there for 'company'. These may be a private issue. I'm not sure if the Constant Companion is the full bottle on this Seal Script, but I'll try to remember to run it past her, and see if she can re-write it for me in less than 3000 year-old style.

Another wild thought that came to me. The 'things' character can also mean 'type' or 'variety', so the inscription might read '1000 [whatever] type'. The character has yet another meaning, 'seed', so I suppose it might, at a very great stretch, refer to shipments of seedlings.

If you want to understand my perplexity, this http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E7%A8%AE is an online dictionary page for the wretched character.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/01/2011   02:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'll back in Forbin as weighted towards revenues Tony,
I could not see them including them if they were
a dedicated item seal.
As for the perplexity, I'll leave that to you
You should be used to it now, collecting the Princely States

Appreciation, of course, goes without saying.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2574 Posts
Posted 09/01/2011   03:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add timbres667 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
finc
The Costa Rica Treasury stamp would be a superb addition to my tall ships collection.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by timbres667 - 09/01/2011 03:43 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7070 Posts
Posted 09/01/2011   09:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So I got to thinking that Yvert lists some "colis postaux" issues, and not just for France, so I checked to see if these were listed under Japan, and I didn't see them. It is difficult to use that to prove what these aren't, and I'm not up to speed with Yvert's listing policies. (Their policies could be just as Byzantine as Scott's, for all I know.)

But it might lend some additional support to their revenue-ness?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 09/01/2011   09:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Now, Rod, as you well know, Japanese postage stamps, let alone revenues aren't my thing, so you'll naturally treat my remarks with great caution ...

My difficulty with these stamps as revenues is that Japanese postage stamps of that era were all inscribed 'Japanese Empire':



These stamps, however, are inscribed 'Domestic freight ... company ... freight ...' with the ellipses standing for characters I can't make out. Here are the crucial first three characters, though:



If I didn't know that Forbin classified them as revenues, I'd unhesitatingly say they were private freight company prepayment labels.

Incidentally, the large character at the top of the stamps is the same as the third character in my 'Domestic freight'. It has a range of meanings associated with carriage and mail.

Edit: Having worked on the characters in the horseshoe a bit more, I can now make out everything except the last couple - I think. They read (right to left) Local/Domestic Forwarding Company Freight ...

I think Forbin is wrong, and these, on the face of it at least, are private freight company labels. However, having said that, a Google search didn't throw up the company name.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by tonymacg - 09/01/2011 10:14 am
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 4,222Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05