Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Question About PSE

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,357Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
8 Posts
Posted 03/25/2012   8:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add alex3791 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message

Hi,

I had a tough experience with PSE recently, and I'm wondering if other people had similar experiences with them. I bought an OGpH #229 last November, with a clean 2010 PF certificate graded 90 stating "previously hinged at bottom right". I submitted the stamp to PSE for recertification a few weeks later; they kept the stamp for almost 3 months and returned it to me last week with significantly damaged gum. The pictures are below: the first picture is the nice stamp before I submitted it to PSE, the second picture is the stamp I got back last week, with almost 1/3 of the gum missing and gum-soaked perforations at upper right.





It is pretty clear that the gum of the stamp was damaged significantly at some point during certification. Could somebody tell me if they had a similar experience with PSE? Any advice on how to deal with them? I thought they were a reputable company but I'm not sure what to think anymore.

Thanks,

Alex
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6664 Posts
Posted 03/25/2012   8:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There are other possibilities here. I have never heard of PSE damaging a Stamp before, not to say it's never happened but perhaps somewhere in between PSE & your destination it might have been in a humid environment or something along those lines. What shipping method did they use to return the item ? What type of envelope did they use ? Have you contacted them about this ? How that stamp graded out at a 90 is beyond me. It's a lovely piece but it has a couple of nibbled perfs and a couple of nibbled corners.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
8 Posts
Posted 03/25/2012   9:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add alex3791 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the reply. I sent the stamp by registered mail and got it back by registered mail as well. I'm pretty sure it didn't get damaged on its way back, since there were no traces of gum on the holder. Also, I submitted it with 2 other stamps, which came back fine as far as I can tell.

The PF certificate number is 485738. I have a few other stamps from this set, and my feeling is that's pretty much how a stamp graded 90 from that period looks.

Alex
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6664 Posts
Posted 03/25/2012   9:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Have you contacted them regarding this ?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
8 Posts
Posted 03/25/2012   9:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add alex3791 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I emailed them the 2 pictures, but didn't get a reply yet. I'll try calling them tomorrow, but I was wondering if somebody on the forum had some advice on how to deal with this.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts
Posted 03/26/2012   12:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add finches to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
PSE's Guarantee; •No guarantee can be offered regarding the mint or used status, grade or condition of non-encapsulated stamps.

'Ambiguous point' giving PSE a back door regarding returned condition of sent item(s).


Alex3791, I see and agree with your concern, 'assuming' you scanned the bottom image in exactly the same spot regarding position on your scanner plate etc.

That being said, the bottom stamp IS lighter front and back, noticeable easily on Gentleman's hair.

Under PC Mag's exposed/lone perf hairs appear significantly reduced in bottom scan indicating the stamp has been subjected(dipped/sprayed) with a evaporative fluid, causing VERY FINE paper fibers to stick/bond/lay/reposition onto stamp.

IMO, PSE have devalued your stamp - more than it cost you for the service. To take almost 3 months it's appears they are far too busy to dedicate adequate care to collectors possessions.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
8 Posts
Posted 03/31/2012   09:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add alex3791 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I finally got to talk to PSE and they offered reasonable compensation: they will reimburse me about 60% of what I had paid for the stamp and allow me to keep it. The somewhat disappointing part is that somebody there probably knew that the gum of the stamp had been damaged in the process, but decided to send it back to me anyway without mentioning it.

I guess it's a good idea to keep good records, such as good photos, of any submissions, even to reputable companies such as PSE.

Thanks to those who replied.

Alex
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,357Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05