| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,953 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6447 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
Wow, that is a nice attractive collection you got there. I have been successful thus far in staving off the desire to collect US revenues. ;o) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6447 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1225 Posts |
|
|
I tend to stay away from lots. I didn't do very well when I did. Perhaps I should try again. If fun could be measured you have it in spades!
Art |
Send note to Staff
|
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (The exact & entire wording of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
71 Posts |
|
|
These are really nice looking! I don't really look for revenues to collect, but I could be tempted. Sheesh - as if it weren't bad enough that Tony's trying to subvert us all to collect Indian States, and Sir Rodney has me hankering after postmarks! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
862 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6447 Posts |
|
|
Just recieved the lot today, and after examining the collection, I'm doing the snoopy dance. Exceptionally clean quality.
Some of the images in the listing were broken links. The description mentioned 25 pages, but only about 20 were shown, even including the broken links, so I checked the image properties, analyzed the naming convention in the filenames, and tried accessing the missing images by typing the URLs directly into the browser... which worked. I found several pages of stamps not shown in the listing, however when reconciling against the verbal description, it all added up.
I'm guessing that most people didn't bother to do the sleuthing, and never saw the missing pages, as now that I've cataloged the lot, it went for much less than it should have.
Just for fun, without spending a whole lot of time on it, what do YOU guesstimate the above lot catalogs for in 2012 Scott, using the following guidelines:
1. All stamps are shown; there's nothing you're not seeing.
2. I did not include any thing cataloging under $2.
3. I discounted heavily where there where obvious faults.
4. All cut and punch cancels are cataloged as such.
5. I did not assign any premium for cancels (which is just pure bonus, as the collection is loaded with them).
By way of disclosure, even having seen all images prior to bidding, I was WAAAAAAYYY off in my guesstimate.
I'll give it a few days and give the total. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| Edited by revenuecollector - 08/17/2012 12:06 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
845 Posts |
|
|
My 5 second est. Is $1700 CV and I'm guessing you paid a little less than 10% of that. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by HungaryForStamps - 08/17/2012 01:29 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10670 Posts |
|
|
I figured the whole lot as roughly $2500 cat, at auction it would be probably be estimated at $400-$600 and if properly described with the cancels and the better second and third issues as the draw it might bring as much as $750-$800. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6447 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I figured the whole lot as roughly $2500 cat, at auction it would be probably be estimated at $400-$600 and if properly described with the cancels and the better second and third issues as the draw it might bring as much as $750-$800. Heh. We're on the same page, Bart. That was approximately my assessment when making my max bid. I'll let this run a while before revealing the actual numbers. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts |
|
|
On your first page of Proprietary, your 6c is remarkably similar to mine, yours cancelled May 4, mine Sep 4. Could this be some kind of precancel?  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6447 Posts |
|
|
Charles Osgood cancels were ubiquitous on proprietary stamps; his company was one of the major users of the stamps. In fact, I believe that the 6c Proprietary (R31c) was created specifically at the request of the company (Bart, please correct me if I'm misremembering, but I believe that was the case). |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10670 Posts |
|
|
It was at Osgood's request that the stamp was created; 600 sheets were printed and delivered on April 13, 1871. The second issue stamps were delivered Sept. 2, 1871, as were the first proprietary issue. This short usage time and the way proprietaries were used is why the R31c is so scarce. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10670 Posts |
|
|
To answer the question of precancels, yes they were. That is why you can see a bit of another cancel at the left margin. Many revenues with SON cancels from the 1862-1875 era were precancelled by the companies. This both helped to prevent theft and saved time, since the stamp was to be put on a document to show proof of tax paid the precancel made no difference(effectively the tax was paid when the stamp was purchased). |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,953 |
|