Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1898 Commerce Stamps Imperf. Vert. Pairs? Please Help ID

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,706Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
294 Posts
Posted 11/01/2012   03:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add UFOAirMail to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Ok last for tonight,or this morning should I say hehehe ...can anyone tell me if these are as follows in Scotts~
R173 R16b~



R174 R16a~



I have these also and cannot find the colors in pairs in scotts,any help here on these~






Send note to Staff
Edited by UFOAirMail - 11/01/2012 04:13 am

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts
Posted 11/01/2012   09:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jamesw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's difficult to tell from your scans as they are blurry, but I think the first two look rouletted, so they would not be 'a'.
The $1 is a R182 and the $5 a R175. Again hard to tell if the R175 is rouletted or not.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts
Posted 11/01/2012   09:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A clear sharp scan from the back will show whether they are imperf between or not.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts
Posted 11/01/2012   10:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add UFOAirMail to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
in Scotts under R175 and others there as well Scotts has listed "cut cancellation",can anyone tell us what this means and yes I guess all of the pairs have perfs,,Wasnt sure if those were considered perfs in this particular stamp,,any idea on value of pairs like this?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts
Posted 11/01/2012   7:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The government was always worried about revenues being cleaned and reused. This was especially true of the first issue revenues of 1862-1871, and was the reason that the second and third issues came out on the Willcox Chameleon Paper which was designed to prevent this problem.
Cut cancels were one of the more obvious solutions. They were devices which ranged in style from a simple 4 straight slices to circular cuts to actual punch holes of various types which removed parts of the design. Perforated initials were also used frequently, especially in the 20th century.
Pairs of these particular stamps are not very uncommon, although they are nice to have. Any revenue multiple is worth keeping in one's collection regardless of catalog value. Because revenue stamps were created to pay specific tax rates they usually had face values that matched the needed tax amounts. Therefore in general they were used singly much more frequently then in multiple, although for the most common types of taxes (especially from 1898 forward) multiples were used with great frequency.
This site is a great place to see what multiples are known to exist on many revenue stamps. Of course it is far from complete and should only be used as a guide, although the first, second, third, and 1871-1875 proprietary issues are a pretty fair indication of what actually exists.
http://www.thecurtiscollection.com/
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,706Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.63 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05