Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Washington-Franklin Star And "A" Plates

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 3,272Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...

United States
1271 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   5:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Al E. Gator to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
OK, I know I've read it, but just can't find it now. Open star, Solid star and "A" plate designations on Washington-Franklin plates were used to distinguish spacing between stamps on the outer rows of the stamps in an attempt to solve the problem of perforation. I need to know what spacing went with which designation. I'd be Appreciative of anyone who can give me this info.
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
26 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   6:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Carbon12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You can take a look at this for a quick description of what your looking for with some great examples:

http://www.americanstamphistory.com/

After you pull up the site go to the section on printing methods and about 4 pages in to that section you'll hit WFs, "stars" and "A"s.

Also there's a nice two page article titled "Star Plates" in The Bureau Specialist, January, 1964, PP. 8-9. Author: Lewis A. Miles.

There's tons of stuff out there on this topic, taking a look at these two will get you up to speed quickly.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   6:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Can't get the PDF from the web site to open up--opens, downloads so far then freezes up. L. Miles article does indicate that the "A" plate was for the 2-3/4mm spacing but he does not identify what spacing was identified by the open and solid stars. I'll keep looking---I know its covered in multiple articles--just need to find one of them.Thanks!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   7:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's a shame it doesn't work for you Al. There is some great info in there.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
26 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   8:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Carbon12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In the WF series there were 5 marginal imprints used by BEP. Some had no stars, some had an open star, and some had a closed star, some had an "A". Stars, A's etc let the the perforating machinery folks know how to set the perforating equipment up. Here's a recap of the five imprints and what they meant:

IX -- No BEP imprint, just a 4 digit number. Pretty sure this was uniform 2mm spacing

X -- <BEP> imprint, open star, 4 digits. 3mm spacing on outside six columns on each side and 2mm spacing on the rest in the middle.

XI -- <BEP> imprint, closed star, 4 digits. I have no idea what the spacing was on this one. I'm sure I've read about it, but I can't find it.... Might be a gradual change in spacing across the width of the plate from 3mm to 2mm and back to 3mm.

XII <BEP> imprint "A" 4 digits. Uniform 2.75mm spacing.

XIII No BEP imprint "A" 4 digits. Uniform 2.75mm spacing.

I'm sorry I couldn't find the data on the closed star spacing. I know I've read it, but I can't find anything now, other than it was first used on plate 4976 to print 2c Lincoln Commems, then used on one plate each for Sc 331/331a (4980), 332/332a (4988), and 343 (4980).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   9:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just tried the web site again. Still freezing up on me. The roman numeral designations are in the Durland Catelogue but with no indication as to what demensions they are tied to. Thanks so much for the information that you have provided. I'll find the solid star info. eventually. thanks again!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 04/02/2014   9:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Al, you may have a problem with your browser plug-in. They download fine for me as well.

If you want, I can email the pdf's to you. Let me know which one (or all of them). Just send me an email via SCF.

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 04/02/2014 9:12 pm
Valued Member
26 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   08:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Carbon12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
More info--

"A Categorization of Marginal Markings: Modified Layout Designations, Part I."

By D'Avino
in The US Specialist, Apr, 2004, p152.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   09:45 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Carbon12---thats what I needed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   2:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Russ to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Type X and XI had the variable spacing all others were a consistent 2.75mm.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   3:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Russ! You can always be counted upon to locate terrific documentation. Love this site!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
26 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   6:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Carbon12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Russ--What's the source for the info you provided? I guess what I really want to know is where did the data on spacing between subjects come from. I know this is a 100 year old issue, and it's probably been answered before. All I can find are second and third hand references. Someone repeating what someone else said, or making a guess.

Who looked at plate proofs, measured them and wrote it down?

I simply can't imagine the BEP worker bees adding a colored-in solid star for no particular reason (especially the same reason the open star was used), and then dumping it a few days later. Just doesn't make sense. In a bureaucracy no body ever changes anything unless it makes their job easier; makes their work go away; or somebody important shoves it down their throat.

Thanks jim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts
Posted 04/04/2014   7:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Russ to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I remember correctly the information came from an old edition of the American Philatelist. The pictures are from the plate proofs at the National Postal Museum.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 3,272Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05