Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1899 Franklin Cut Square U353 Watermark Question.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,083Next Topic  
Valued Member
410 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   03:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add CoinWatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This U353 has a very clear "P" in the watermark. Is this par for the course?





Send note to Staff
Edited by CoinWatcher - 04/19/2014 05:10 am

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   10:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
US POD maybe?

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   11:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe its Watermark 13 in use on 1899-1902 issues. Here's what the watermark would have looked like in its entirety:

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
410 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   2:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add CoinWatcher to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, that narrows it down. Is this watermark listed on the U353 1c green on amber?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   2:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your question about watermarks is probably best left to the Postal Stationery expert (I'm not one!).

However, I can tell you that in the introductory paragraphs of the Scott Catalog, it suggests that:

"Watermarks in envelope paper, illustrated in this introduction, were mandatory from their first appearance in 1853."

"Watermarks usually have been changed with every four year contract, and thus serve to identify the envelope contractor, and since 1911, the manufacturer of the paper."

It goes on to finally note that "Beginning with Scott U615, unwatermarked paper was used for some issues. Beginning with Scott U625, unwatermarked paper was used for all issues."

The Scott Catalog, therefore, does not mention watermarked varieties in individual listings, but mentions "unwatermarked" ones from Scott U615 to U625.

Since the subject of this post is Scott U353, which was issued in 1899, it follows that watermark 13 in the illustration previously shown from that year would have been used.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 04/19/2014 3:03 pm
Pillar Of The Community
621 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   4:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ThomasGalloway to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"Is this watermark listed on the U353 1c green on amber?"

Yes. And in fact, it is the only watermark for the U353.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
410 Posts
Posted 04/19/2014   7:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add CoinWatcher to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks ThomasGalloway that is good to know.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,083Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05