Agree that the stamp has little value, but this is obviously a collector trying to learn, so didn't want to confuse/mislead him that it could only be the Scott number you said it "clearly" was. It's not "clearly" a Scott 492.
Part of learning is knowing all the possibilities and understanding what distinguishes one from the other.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here