Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any Help With Identifying The Scott # Would Be Appreciated

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,112Next Topic  
New Member

United States
2 Posts
Posted 11/29/2014   9:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add cashinwithdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello,

I am new to the forum so hello to everyone, I am not really a stamp collector but I have a just come into a lot of foreign and domestic stamps. Most I could look up myself, but when trying to look up the Washington 1 Cent Green stamp the large amount of varying formats just plain confused me. I would be thankful for any comments you may have on the stamp that I have pictured with this post.

Thank you in advance.

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10588 Posts
Posted 11/29/2014   10:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Scott 498 is most likely, perf 11 flat plate unwatermarked. Alas, an incredibly common stamp used.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts
Posted 11/29/2014   11:39 pm  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually, I believe it is the perforated 12, Scott 405 (which is also extremely common). The definition of perforation gauge is the number of perforations (either points or holes) per a 2 centimeter length.

Welcome to the Stamp Community Forum!

-dave0
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1756 Posts
Posted 11/29/2014   11:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Positively a 405... here's a clear
unused copy for comparision...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/U-S-UNUSED-...em1e95ed2056
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1270 Posts
Posted 11/30/2014   09:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is #405
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10588 Posts
Posted 11/30/2014   11:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
One of the tricks on stamps of this size to determine the perforations is to count the FULL horizontal perf holes. These stamps are almost exactly 20mm wide. If you count the holes on the stamp posted above you will get 11. If you count the holes on the 405 posted you will get 12. Remember, full holes only.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
937 Posts
Posted 11/30/2014   12:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Historical DNA Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
From Clark (concerning the horizontals): "A perf 11 stamp will have 11 holes and 10 tips or 11 tips and 10 complete holes between the lines." This can be used to identify perf 10 and 12 by counting above or below the numbers quoted for perf 11. I count 11 holes and just above 10 tips on this stamp.

Often times looking at the vertical is necessary and/or can help determining perfs. This is obviously a flat plate print, isn't 10x12 nor the 12x10 possibility, so the vertical perfs should be the same as the horizontal (only applies to certain series such as this flat plate print 1c 1908 series Washington).

I count 13 complete holes and a small portion of one tip on the left vertical side. Perf 10 will have approximately 11 complete holes, perf 11 =~ 12 holes, and perf 12 =~ 13 holes

I scaled a known perf 12 to the same design size to get this comparison. Note that paper can shrink or a printing can be larger than others, but comparing whole number perf differences is pretty easy to see:



Last Edit: Note that you can only use this image scaling method with stamps that have the same design size. Doing it with flat plate stamps is almost always safe. It gets trickier with rotaries and offset printings. Also, this will not work with booklet compared to non-booklet stamps. It also won't work for comparing AEF booklet to normal booklet stamps. Your results on non-flat plate prints can be useful, but need to be done while considering more factors.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Historical DNA Collector - 11/30/2014 1:00 pm
New Member
United States
2 Posts
Posted 12/01/2014   2:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cashinwithdave to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hey guys. Thanks for the info. It gets very complicated for someone not in stamps all the time.

Again, thanks for the help.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
339 Posts
Posted 12/01/2014   11:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TheStampNut to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You might find this link helpful as it can provide lots of good information: http://www.theswedishtiger.com/ID.html
Welcome to the hobby...its kept me sane most my life and I'm collecting many years.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,112Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05