1923 Harding Discovered

Hi litho,
Well all joining this forum just join for one reason and that is the immense joy in sharing knowledge,well we are not here to put down anyone or put personal remarks,thee only reason we all like minded hobby loving people are here is to gain and not drain....so do the needful in keeping the etiquette,just next time try being civilised.

Well my dear thomasblr did you finally find out
about your precious Harding?




And please don't be so rude , I certainly don't
need lessons from you in etiquette or civility.

Hahaha litho grow up,don't be a sisy girl,move on focus ur energy on better things in life..

Actual Canadians are know for politeness others who don't show those traits don't belong any where.

Looks like you and dizzy always want the last word.

I'm tired of this pi**ing contest and I see now
you are a troll.

lithograving my old buddy, I see me in you.
And I think that is a good thing...

thomasblr..We Canadians are a no bull**** people...Enjoy your fun on the forum...BUT just watch what you write...OK..?

Hi litho you poor did you ever quote----


Quote:
I`ve been collecting for nearly sixty years and have just sold my collection of g.b. so me and my wife can go on cruises now wer`e retired.


Hi Paul

That must have been quite a collection if it's paying for
your cruises.

I'm hoping to take the family out to MacDonalds
with the proceeds of mine.

Nice to see you finally mastered the search function.

Maybe now you can find out about your valuable
Hardings without asking the same questions
over and over again.

Well wert the blame is on litho for being arrogant nothing to do with ur nationality.so may be you need to read wat I wrote against whom properly,

Litho who's asking you,well I did not invite you to my forum,you your self came ,so don't bother to answer any of my next,that's know as sense,

This thread is a train wreck.

I agree with Stalzer. Can everyone please be the family we all are?

This poor fellow's question is that he wants us to help him find the Scott number of his stamp.

If he's still here, it looks perf 11 to me which would make it a #610. I'm probably wrong because I'm not that good at judging perfs from photo's or scans. A better scan would help. So if I'm wrong, someone please chime in.

thomas, getting a good perforation gauge doesn't cost that much, and if you have this question on this stamp, you will have the same one on zillions more.

Welcome to the forum, buddy!


-IBFS

Edit: 610 is the pref 11. sorry.

Lithograving has valid points. Take a look at the posting history of the OP that Litho presents on p. 2 upthread. And on other threads, the OP exhibits considerable knowledge of US Classics which does not square with a pose as a neophyte on the 613 etc.

You can sure tell we are family here can't you. If not we sure sound like it. . Love this place and all the help that is given. Some times the truth hurts but we reflect on this and keep going and tomorrow it will be as nothing has happened. Why? Because we are family.
Yeah, I kinda troll sometimes I mean I look for my questions to see if anyone has had a similar one and sometimes I just troll to read what everyone is talking about and the new finds that have been found. But sometimes I do ask questions when needed, because I am a Newby and there is soooooo much to learn as we know things are not laid out in black and white. At least not stamps. Thank you SCF

Newby, I agree with your sentiments, but I think the word you might be looking for is "lurk." We are lucky to have had surprisingly few trolls here.