Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help With Stamp 156?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,068Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   01:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Joe to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I think this is 156 it looks like it has the secret mark, but my problem is with the paper. To me it is a hard paper snaps when flicked, it is thin and translucent no yellow when held up to a light. But in my mind it can not be a 167. So I have two questions, apparently a white wove paper, is fairly hard, but not as hard as a hard white paper and there is difference in between ultra and ultrmarine. I thought I had this hard paper down is there a common stamp that I might have that would be a Hard white wove paper?



Send note to Staff
Edited by Joe - 03/19/2015 01:43 am

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   07:54 am  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Definitely Scott 156. Neat red PAID cancel!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1805 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   08:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi, Joe,

The Scott terminology on paper "hardness" can be confusing unless you have an array of reference copies to use for comparison. The light test is better than the "flick" test for determining "hard" vs. "soft," in my opinion. The non-soft-paper issues came in a variety of paper thicknesses, so a given number (156, for example) can be found on white paper that impresses as different degrees of "hardness." "Ultra" = ultramarine (unless one is speaking about Crayola color names).

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
763 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   10:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bill Weiss to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As mentioned here numerous times, it is wise to use a known hard paper and known soft paper to use as your reference/benchmark copies to compare with your unknown copy. It is easy to find stamps that absolutely MUST be hard or soft paper. All pre-1873 stamps are HARD paper, so choose any one of those and all stamps issued between 1882-1901 are SOFT paper so choose any of them. For hard, the cheapest is a used/faulty Scott #65 or Scott #147 and for soft a #210 or #213 or #230-231, etc.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3154 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   10:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Of course this would be a fine time to post my Back lit paper comparison, so here we are. Ignore the fact that the stamps are 3 cent Agriculture stamps, look at all of the white parts of Goerge, forehead, and the neck area.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 03/19/2015 10:58 am
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   11:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks guys

I am going to classify it as a 156 I have a 158 from the same batch, that it compares to, although in hardness they compare with the early Washingtons I have.

Phill what kind of back light are you using perhaps my lights are too bright.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3154 Posts
Posted 03/19/2015   1:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
LOL..Its a small hand held Dorcy 5 position led flashlight. The switch has 5 positions, Flashligh ( light I used ), off, night ( green light) 50%, and 100%. It has a 2" lens in front, is 4 7/8" long and about 1 1/2" in diameter. The different light settings use different parts of the led to focus the light beam, The flashlight setting throws a wide beam, which lights up the whole stamp instead of a small spot in the middle of it. I'd include a pic, but my Nikon refuses to open the lens covers.curses, mutter, mutter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts
Posted 03/20/2015   1:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Phil
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3154 Posts
Posted 03/20/2015   2:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You're welcome Joe. Actually, I think that the "frame" I put the stamp in has more to do with the overall picture quality than the light does. To make that frame I cut out a 26mm x 20mm rectangle hole in one of these. The dimentions are the size of the image of a banknote stamp, the perfs rest on the edges of the opening. Hope that helps. The "frame" and the stamp within then sits atop the light, allowing you to photograph it.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 03/20/2015 3:57 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,068Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05