Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

#26 Dull Red Only?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,765Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2943 Posts
Posted 02/13/2016   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add stampcrow to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This #26 on cover has a deeper appearance. Might just be well preserved. It's an 1858 folded letter. Are there other colors during this period?


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts
Posted 02/13/2016   7:11 pm  Show Profile Check sinclair2010's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add sinclair2010 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Absolutely. See the article by David T Beals III in the February 1974 issue of the Chronicle. Did I mention my shade fetish?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1271 Posts
Posted 02/13/2016   7:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yellow Brown, Claret, Deep Claret, Plum, Purplish Claret, Rose Brown, Brownish Carmine are 1857 colors that could have been used in 1858?.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2943 Posts
Posted 02/13/2016   7:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampcrow to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Did I mention my shade fetish?

Sinclair2010, I believe this is the time for an LOL.
I will check that article. Thanks.

Gator, that 'bout covers it.
I had done a quick check of Siegels power search. Everything came up Dull Red.
Thanks guys.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2226 Posts
Posted 02/14/2016   01:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Classic Coins to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Did I mention my shade fetish?

I hope you're not confusing "shade" for "color." "Shade" is a term I incorrectly used interchangeably with "color" for many years.

Jump to the "Tints, Shades, and Tones" section of this brilliant color reference for a real eye opener!

http://www.tigercolor.com/color-lab...ry-intro.htm
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts
Posted 02/14/2016   4:19 pm  Show Profile Check sinclair2010's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add sinclair2010 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gary,

That kind of pedantry may be appropriate for a book or scholarly article in a journal but the use of the word "shade" where the word "color" is supposed to be used is ubiquitous. Search for the word "shade" on PF certs or using Siegel's powersearch and you will find it everywhere. I am not saying that a million wrongs make a right but we all seem to able to communicate what is important. Now, I hope you are not trying to engage in one-upmanship on the subject of color because I am not as vulnerable as you apparently think.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
937 Posts
Posted 02/16/2016   01:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Historical DNA Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Mr. Winston Sinclair,
It seems that you perceive offense from Gary's (Classic Coins) post and feel the need to be defensive. Unfortunately, I cannot perceive exactly what your concern is. I am interested to know how the exchange of thoughts could have been better made.

As you know, I am also quite interested in advancing shade/color identification in philately. I am writing to you now in effort to hopefully focus our efforts concerning this matter.

Please elaborate with your thoughts about how to further such exchanges of concepts.

I absolutely respect you and certainly believe that you have valuable knowledge to contribute to the cause of color/shade identification in philately. My uncertainty lies in how we should best collaborate our efforts to promote the advancement of this facet.

I sincerely want to know your thoughts.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :)
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,765Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05