That kind of pedantry may be appropriate for a book or scholarly article in a journal but the use of the word "shade" where the word "color" is supposed to be used is ubiquitous. Search for the word "shade" on PF certs or using Siegel's powersearch and you will find it everywhere. I am not saying that a million wrongs make a right but we all seem to able to communicate what is important. Now, I hope you are not trying to engage in one-upmanship on the subject of color because I am not as vulnerable as you apparently think.
Mr. Winston Sinclair, It seems that you perceive offense from Gary's (Classic Coins) post and feel the need to be defensive. Unfortunately, I cannot perceive exactly what your concern is. I am interested to know how the exchange of thoughts could have been better made.
As you know, I am also quite interested in advancing shade/color identification in philately. I am writing to you now in effort to hopefully focus our efforts concerning this matter.
Please elaborate with your thoughts about how to further such exchanges of concepts.
I absolutely respect you and certainly believe that you have valuable knowledge to contribute to the cause of color/shade identification in philately. My uncertainty lies in how we should best collaborate our efforts to promote the advancement of this facet.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here