Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Russian Stamps.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 5,831Next Topic  
Valued Member
12 Posts
Posted 09/17/2010   4:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Asad to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Evaluation please!!
Are these worth anything at all?!










Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 09/17/2010   5:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
From the original thread...

In nice condition, the first would have a catalogue value of several dollars, and the second, a few dollars. I believe the others are more common.

There is something going on with the condition of a couple of them. The first, in particular, appears to have heavy staining, which might reduce the value to near zero. A couple of them have small issues with the perforations, as well.

One thing that is often surprising to people who are new to stamps is that the early Russian material exists in huge quantities. The supply far outstrips the demand.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
USA
2504 Posts
Posted 09/17/2010   5:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add modern_who to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To me, these appear to be (in order shown):

Scott # and catalog value (in reality, you can't get catalog value

37 - 6.00
43 - 6.00
28 - 1.00
36 - .75
227 - .30
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Larry, APS Member

Modern-Vue Stamps on eBay
Edited by modern_who - 09/17/2010 5:21 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   05:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rohumpy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
On the first one, the pattern of the "discoloration" is that of the overprinted Burelage?? Is that the right term? It was a security measure, I think.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   08:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The first stamp isn't Scott #37 (which didn't have thunderbolts on the post horns). Instead it's Scott design A11.

The staining is actually the varnish lozenge pattern on the 1900 issue which has discoloured with age. The stamp is Scott #84 or #84a or #84b.

The second stamp is also type A11 so isn't Scott #43.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   08:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
varnish lozenge pattern on the 1900 issue which has discoloured with age.


Nice detective work Nigel!

Further:
The postage design ink was printed over the varnish,
and any attempt to wash a postmark off would also
was the print off.

Example from when I was a newbie with Austria, when
I washed the gum from this stamp with similar but lined varnish.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 5,831Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05