Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

$20 Newspaper Periodical Stamp

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,933Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   4:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Thought someone might enjoy seeing this one.



I believe it's a PR123.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   5:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
PR123 with Watermark
or
PR111 without Watermark
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   5:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hmmm...I never took it out of the mount to look...but now that you mentioned it I scanned the back (which is not in the best shape).



Is that stamped "reprint" (?) I must originally have taken that to mean R123 versus R111. No watermark is apparent (to the naked eye) anyway.

I see there's a note at the bottom of the Scott listings suggesting there was a 1899 reprint of the higher values to meet demand when they were sold in sets, which are virtually indistinguishable from earlier printings. Could this explain the "reprint" mark?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   7:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Short answer, Yes.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   7:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Who looks at the back?
I think it's a beautiful design / stamp.
I'd certainly like to have one.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   10:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes Rod, the Front... the lady is not bad
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   10:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

do we know who engraved them?
As an antipodean, I am expecting to see
"American Banknote..."

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 09/18/2010   11:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Originally produced by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.


Here is an imprint block that I don't own:


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Cjd - 09/18/2010 11:09 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts
Posted 09/19/2010   05:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rohumpy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What I have never understood is how they got away with showing a female with a bare bosom. This isn't the only example of this. The 1902 definitives also show the female form in a state of undress. I suppose that it being an allegorical figure might explain it some.

But then in 1917, the Standing Liberty Quarter also showed a depiction of "Liberty" with exposed breasts and it had to be modified by putting what looks like chain mail on the top!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 09/19/2010   5:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The $20 stamp would not be seen by the average American, so it might not "count" as much in the discussion. The 2-cent Pan American (Scott 295...the train stamp) is probably the most-overt example I can think of. I've never read whether there was any outcry. Certainly, by the time of the Type I Standing Liberty Quarter, there was plenty of outcry, so I would say no one "got away with" the quarter...

I wonder if anyone gave the quarter incident any thought when preparing the Ericsson Memorial issue (Scott 628) around ten years later?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
527 Posts
Posted 09/21/2010   1:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fredcdobbs to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Examining the back of the Newspaper stamps or the Ericsson stamp is like saying you only read the articles in magazines.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/21/2010   9:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hahahahaha
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
977 Posts
Posted 09/23/2010   5:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ratio411 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm sorry, I don't see what the big deal is (was) with the the
bare breasted stamps/coins... I don't imagine there were any
cases of adolescent boys locking themselves in the bathroom for
20 minutes with a stamp... Or any dad's wondering why their
pocket change is stuck together. A bunch of worry over nothing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 09/25/2010   12:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A different time.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,933Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05