| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,933 |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
Hmmm...I never took it out of the mount to look...but now that you mentioned it I scanned the back (which is not in the best shape).  Is that stamped "reprint" (?) I must originally have taken that to mean R123 versus R111. No watermark is apparent (to the naked eye) anyway. I see there's a note at the bottom of the Scott listings suggesting there was a 1899 reprint of the higher values to meet demand when they were sold in sets, which are virtually indistinguishable from earlier printings. Could this explain the "reprint" mark? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Who looks at the back? I think it's a beautiful design / stamp. I'd certainly like to have one.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
 do we know who engraved them? As an antipodean, I am expecting to see "American Banknote..." |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
Originally produced by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Here is an imprint block that I don't own:  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Cjd - 09/18/2010 11:09 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
What I have never understood is how they got away with showing a female with a bare bosom. This isn't the only example of this. The 1902 definitives also show the female form in a state of undress. I suppose that it being an allegorical figure might explain it some.
But then in 1917, the Standing Liberty Quarter also showed a depiction of "Liberty" with exposed breasts and it had to be modified by putting what looks like chain mail on the top! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
The $20 stamp would not be seen by the average American, so it might not "count" as much in the discussion. The 2-cent Pan American (Scott 295...the train stamp) is probably the most-overt example I can think of. I've never read whether there was any outcry. Certainly, by the time of the Type I Standing Liberty Quarter, there was plenty of outcry, so I would say no one "got away with" the quarter...
I wonder if anyone gave the quarter incident any thought when preparing the Ericsson Memorial issue (Scott 628) around ten years later? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
527 Posts |
|
|
Examining the back of the Newspaper stamps or the Ericsson stamp is like saying you only read the articles in magazines.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
977 Posts |
|
|
I'm sorry, I don't see what the big deal is (was) with the the bare breasted stamps/coins... I don't imagine there were any cases of adolescent boys locking themselves in the bathroom for 20 minutes with a stamp... Or any dad's wondering why their pocket change is stuck together. A bunch of worry over nothing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,933 |
|