When The Post Office Gets Pulled Into Politics

Trump v. California 26A124 only said that a discussion cannot be stayed; it said nothing about whether the request was legal or not. Basically it said that TALKING about throwing a brick through a window is not illegal. Actually throwing it is. So it was temporarily stayed until there was some attempt to implement it.

Since I don't live in California, I am not up on the local political issues there. Of course, if you don't like the "Democratic dictatorship", you are free to move to a red state with a "Republican dictatorship". There are plenty of choices with low wages, low health numbers and low education numbers. Anyone looking at those lists know that.

Please either move this thread to the General Discussion area or lock it. Any connection to philately was originally tenuous at best, and now is gone entirely.

Dale

Tell us your political beliefs without telling us your political beliefs.

Why does that bother you? No one is forced to read it.

[qTell us your political beliefs without telling us your political beliefs.][/q]

This is the real problem; my positions should not be thought of as "political" at all. Taxes are political, voting rights should not be. If people want to make a clear voter registration that shows only legal voters, why not send a card to register everyone from 17.5 years old on? In every state, all at once. Then we would not have need for discussions such as this one.