Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Who Was The Upper Keswick, N.b. Postmaster In 1941

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Replies: 23 / Views: 765Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
192 Posts
Posted Yesterday   12:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Chesham85 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
All of the documents I saw only mentioned postcards. Apologies if it appears otherwise in my response.

Value to the censors were not what we consider items of value. What the censor was required to do was review the text written on the post card. They would be looking info such as shipping, weather, sentiment, and other info that the government would see as potentially valuable to the enemy.

The documented procedures made no mention of other valuables they only were concerning postcards.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Chesham85 - Yesterday 12:46 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
576 Posts
Posted Yesterday   08:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Anthraquinone to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Chesham85

I have been collecting Canada WW2 for some time now. The PASSED FOR EXPORT and CENSOR markings are two different aspects of war time Canadian philately.

Censorship was control the dissemination of sensitive information. . In very general terms it was applied to all items to and from Canada not to domestic mail inside Canada. It is interesting that in the 1945 Newfoundland had not joined the Confederation and for censorship considerations was treated as a foreign country.

Again in very general the PASSED FOR EXPORT handstamps arose from the Foreign Exchange Currency Control regulations which were a completely separate set of rules designed, as the name suggests, to control the flow of currency out of Canada. These complex regulations were controlled by the Foreign Exchange Control Board.

In simple terms this meant the local postmasters had to check mail going out of Canada to ensure that it complied with the FECB regulations. It was the postmasters that applied the PASSED FOR EXPORT handstamps. They are not connected with censorship. In my original post I had assumed that LC was the postmasters initials as some did have their own handstamps. I had not thought about Letters of Credit. This was the first handstamp I have ever seen which included the LC and the only reference book I have for the FECB does not show any examples I can find.

Both are complex subjects with many facets to collecting them.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12704 Posts
Posted Yesterday   12:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Should the topic title be changed to the correct town name, Upper Jemseq/Jemseg?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4439 Posts
Posted Yesterday   2:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
And I add that there is no need to ask for a PM's name as that assumption was also off base.

Edit to remove extra t.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Parcelpostguy - Yesterday 2:56 pm
Pillar Of The Community
6358 Posts
Posted Yesterday   3:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok, so how does this cover fit into the thread?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4439 Posts
Posted Yesterday   5:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Different receiving country and different hand stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
607 Posts
Posted Today  5 Hrs 33 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add archerg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I may offer an alternate explanation, the postmaster (by order of the Foreign Exchange Control Board) was required to ensure mailed items met the criteria for export, and initial same, from 1939 to 1951.

Setting aside the AI debate for the moment in favour of old fashioned detective work and surmise:

I think the strike of the handstamp is incomplete. D. L. C.(ameron) was the postmaster at Fredericton NB at this time (from Archives Canada). I expect that, Fredericton being a much larger post office, the PM had a handstamp made and that this is where the letter was cleared. A smaller post office would just handwrite "Passed for Export" and initial it. Note that Frederiction appears to be the origin P.O. anyway, regardless who the sender was or where she/he resided.

Mr. Becker's contribution is helpful to demonstrate the requirement of initials signifying personal responsibility for inspection. Obviously I doubt the Letter of Credit theory. P.S. Please post a full scan of the cover in the future, also backside if there are useful postmarks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by archerg - Today 5 Hrs 26 Min ago
Valued Member
United Kingdom
367 Posts
Posted Today  40 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Flightle_Bee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For those who were puzzled, like me, as to how Mr Mendenhall got his letter, Atlanta in Indiana had a population of 479 in 1940.

Also, if you think his name sounds like an airbase, yeah, it does.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Replies: 23 / Views: 765Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05