Labels / Stamps On Back? Belgium? Identification, Or Any Ideas. Please .

Very interesting and fully informative. But, on the postmar date I read "11/VI/1946", which is June 11th 1946.

Letter sent to a regiment in the BAOR . (British Army Of the Rhine) 1946
https://collection.nam.ac.uk/detail...1980-09-83-3
The labels with 25 ,19 look like censor labels.

Thanks to all ...

This was sent to a soldier in B Company of the 1st (Jewish) Battalion of the Palestine Regiment.

Elements of the battalion were deployed in Germany as part of the BAOR until mid-1946.

Interesting cover , Would fit nice into a collection of W.W. II military covers.

They look like rationing coupons with the date on them being the end of validity.

So, a correct answer to a question isn't allowed unless if it is identified truthfully as AI generated but is OK if credit to the source isn't given?

The issue is when AI is wrong. We identified the issue long ago on the coin forum.

AI is very frequently flat-out wrong. If it gets pasted here, then that's another vote for being right and reinforces the wrong answer with AI. All the AI bots crawl here constantly.

Also, there is just no way I'm going to let members just answer posts with pasted AI. That just encourages the destruction of any forum that allows it altogether. I won't let it happen.

Please understand when I say, this is not up for debate.

I understand what your saying Bobby. In fact, the first AI answer was wrong and I knew it was wrong. I let the machine know it was wrong and it came up with the right answer (I always verify). Some questions will go unanswered It is a great tool for finding things much faster than the days I have put into finding answers without using it and those answers could also have issues since I am relying on the work of others only without AI. The info is all the same, just arrived at by different means and at different speeds.

No more AI.