|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
| Author |
Replies: 199 / Views: 24,849 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Quote:The MBTA fares website https://www.mbta.com/fares Good post as this month, on September 8th, MBTA has begun to enforce paying fares. Quote: The MBTA is deeply committed to ensuring that the Fare Engagement Program is implemented in a fair, equitable, and non-discriminatory manner. Proactive steps have been taken to prioritize respect, integrity, and equal treatment for all riders, including equitable deployment of the Fare Engagement team; extensive training on topics such as implicit bias, cultural intelligence, de-escalation techniques, youth engagement, accessibility, and customer service; data collection transparency; and a commitment to continuous improvement. If a rider has not paid, the following steps will occur:
...Riders will be asked for their government-issued form of identification, such as a REAL ID, passport, or standard Massachusetts ID. If a rider does not have an ID available, staff will request their name and contact information. A warning or citation will be handed to the rider and mailed if a valid address is provided. If folks unfamiliar with the ride card fail to properly tap, that will be non-payment. ______________________________________________________________ Boston is not the only target, but this maybe helpful by early next year. https://www.boston25news.com/news/l...N7XXY3YEHZE/Quote: BOSTON — U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy has called for immediate action from transit authorities in Chicago and Boston to improve safety for riders and workers, following recent violent incidents. Quote: BOSTON — Police have arrested a Boston commuter wanted in connection with a forceful shove that sent an elderly woman flying onto the concrete in a startling encounter that was caught on camera. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts |
|
|
Hi folks,
In view of the confusion caused by the ongoing tariff situation,
IMPORTANT NEWS FROM BOSTON 2026: September 22, 2025
For Immediate Release
Philatelic Exhibiting Deadline Extended
Several emails have been received by Boston 2026 personnel from prospective exhibitors having heard reports that a 20% importation tariff or bond will be required for exhibits brought into the United States for the show based on their insured value.
Such reports are unsubstantiated.
U.S. financial regulations regarding matters affecting exhibitors, dealers, and postal administrations continue to be monitored by Boston 2026 Government Relations Chair Mick Zais. Boston 2026 has additionally secured a customs broker and professional tariff experts to explain the unique situation of a philatelic exhibition to government officials. We await their rulings.
Understanding that the tariff situation may be dissuading exhibitors from applying, the deadline for philatelic exhibits is being extended one month from September 30 to October 31, when final mandates are expected to be known.
Those contemplating filling out a philatelic or literature application should not hesitate to do so. The literature application deadline of January 30 remains.
The Exhibit Selection Committee's duties will begin as scheduled on October 1, reviewing and approving applications based on those received. Exhibit acceptance notifications will be released by mid-November. Accepted applicants may withdraw without penalty by the time frame fees are expected by national commissioners. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Prexie3c - 09/22/2025 8:15 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Not to put too fine a point on it but you, Prexie3c, have a real issue you are IGNORING. Exhibits may come in as exhibits but there is no law, no show exhibit contract preventing the sale of ones exhibit, part, whole or surplus carried with, while at Boston 2026. Unless you takes legal steps to prevent the sale of anything by incoming foreign exhibitors everything should have a customs tariff bond to collect lawful tariffs due when the foreign owner(s) do not present the same material upon leaving the USA. Now if each and every sale of exhibitor's material is moved through the customs broker on site for proper tariff collection upon sale then that should be fine. {yes and every dealer collects sale taxes due, wink, wink.  ) Likewise any exhibitor coming with a truthful no sale intention and no matter the prices offered, does not sell, no problem. Yeah, that is going to happen.  Of course most philatelists also understand history and the role postage stamp had in the transfer of large amounts of value between countries, especially during the greater WWII era.  Given my understanding of human nature, the committee seems to be up a creek without a paddle, not to mention no canoe either.  Lastly you will not, nor will your hired expert, have any trustworthy tariff answer until after the US Supreme Court hears the case and hands down an opinion. That could be soon, but more likely during the month after the show. Good Luck Edited for a "Y" addition. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 09/22/2025 10:30 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Can a show exist without exhibits?: YES Can a show exist without buying and selling nor any dealers? Well yes it can...
but that tends to be limited to venues such as the Smithsonian National Postal Museum and other locations with words like library, society or museum in the title and not the word, "show."
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12591 Posts |
|
|
The show could offer to pay any tariffs that exhibitors may run afoul of.  Where's Whitey B when you need him. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
You can do it.Quote: one month from September 30 to October 31, when final mandates are expected to be known. That is a completely useless, pointless and inadequate delay when SCOTUS will not hear the case until November 5, 2025. Set your date for November 30 and hope the promised fast track opinion drops by then. Otherwise a late December date is in order. Or perhaps tell them to pay any tariff bond or decline exhibiting and come for the show anyway. These international shows are over subscribed by applications so filling frames will not be an issue. The mark of great leadership is an ability to think on ones feet and make rapid changes in a timely manner in response to changing conditions.Organizations who can do that are winners, those who cannot are out of business. Just look at the current top five companies by capitalization. All were founded, changed and grew during the fast paced digital explosion each under great leadership.Move into the top ten and 8 are winning the same battle against rapid digital change. The two companies which are not are both majority state own oil companies by Saudi Arabia and China. Last thought, looking backwards for solutions, one only needs to go back to 2020 and later where exhibits where shown virtually on line when grouping together was not government approved. You all think you have problems? Here a story about real problem S and how they were solved. Quote: "You Can Do It" – The Day Steve Jobs Changed the World
by Iván Fernández Amil
The late visionary and co-founder of Apple gave a lesson in leadership ahead of the release of the first-ever iPhone some 15 years ago. This is the story of how he overcame seemingly insurmountable obstacles to launch a product that would lead the smartphone revolution.
On Jan. 9, 2007, Steve Jobs gave one of the most important speeches in the history of technology. "Every once in a while, a revolutionary product comes along that changes everything," he said during the keynote address at Macworld Conference & Expo in San Francisco.
"Well, today we're introducing three revolutionary products of this class. The first one is a widescreen iPod with touch controls. The second is a revolutionary mobile phone. And the third is a breakthrough Internet communications device […] These are not three separate devices, this is one device, and we are calling it iPhone. Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone, and here it is."
But, despite appearances, the iPhone at that time was not a functional device. According to news website TechSpot, which spoke with Andy Grignon, a senior engineer with Apple at the time, only some parts of the software worked properly, and the apps consumed excessive amounts of resources, causing it to unexpectedly crash and restart. All the prototypes worked poorly, and something always went wrong during testing for the presentation.
However, on stage, that day, everything worked perfectly.
This was because, as Grignon explained, after hundreds of testing hours, engineers had identified something they called the golden path, a series of actions that, if done in a specific order, would make it seem like the phone worked flawlessly. For example, it could play part of a song or video but not completely, and if you sent an email and then used the browser it would be fine, but if you did those two things backwards the phone would stop working.
Additionally, in order to avoid the device's memory saturation problems that caused it to crash or restart, Jobs used several iPhones that he swapped out on stage without anyone knowing.
What many consider the best presentation in history was an illusion, but it was not magic. Jobs practiced his presentation over and over again until he was sure that everything would work perfectly. He gave the appearance that the iPhone was functional when it really wasn't.
And the issues with the iPhone that Apple needed to resolve before it shipped to customers later that year didn't end there. Another major problem with the prototype was its screen.
The day after the presentation, Jobs called Jeff Williams, Apple's Operations Manager. Recounting the story at a press conference in 2017, Williams said that Jobs had detected a serious snag — the screen had been scratched in his pocket, possibly by keys. That was of course unacceptable; the iPhone could not get scratched. Jobs decided that Apple needed to use glass for the screen instead of hard-coated plastic.
The operations team had tested all the glass options on the market, but none of them were feasible since they all shattered every single time when the iPhone was dropped, as Williams explained. He told Jobs that the necessary technology likely wouldn't be available for another three or four years. The Apple founder is said to have responded: "I don't know how we're going to do it, but when it ships in June, it's going to be glass."
Jobs reached out to Wendell Weeks, the CEO of Corning Incorporated, a New York-based company that manufactures special glass, to explain Apple's conundrum.
A couple of days later, Williams received a call from Weeks. "Hey, your boss called and said my glass sucks," said Weeks, according to Williams. Weeks then suggested using a product dubbed Gorilla Glass that had been developed in the 1960s and that was "sitting on the R&D shelf," but that had never gone to market since there weren't any apparent applications for it.
As written in Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs, once Weeks explained how the glass product was manufactured and the science behind it, Jobs was sold on the idea. He said he wanted as much Gorilla Glass as Corning could make within six months. "We don't have the capacity," Weeks replied. "None of our plants make the glass now."
"Don't be afraid," Jobs replied, according to Isaacson. This stunned Weeks, who tried to explain that a false sense of confidence would not overcome engineering challenges. But that was a premise that Jobs didn't accept. "Yes, you can do it," he said. "Get your mind around it. You can do it."
As Williams tells it, the Apple and Corning "teams scrambled" over "months of sheer terror" to make everything come together.
In the end, it was just eleven days before the iPhone went on sale when Apple announced the change from plastic to glass in a footnote on a press release. In less than six months, Corning was able to mass produce a type of scratch-resistant glass that had never been manufactured before.
Gorilla Glass quickly became one of Corning's main business lines, and in 2019 the company reported $11.5 billion in gross sales, more than double the 2006 figure. The alliance between Apple and Corning Incorporated continues to this day. Apple said that by 2019 it had spent nearly $3 billion with Corning on the glass used in its products, including the iPad and every generation of the Apple Watch and iPhone.
On June 29, 2007, the day the iPhone went on sale around the world, Jobs sent a message to Corning Incorporated's chief executive: "We couldn't have done it without you" – a message that Weeks keeps framed in his office. Need I remind anyone his own company, the one he founded fired his backside and not in a kind way. Later when they realized they needed to merge with Steve's current company (well just one of them) to survive he was welcomed back home. And just like another great leader whose name is known world wide and was just in the news, Steve did not have a college degree. Nor did the other Steve until 16 years later when Woz received his degree in 1987 from UC Berkeley in the name of, Rocky Raccoon Clark. Come on guys, You can do it. Edited for missing "re' on a word. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 09/23/2025 01:38 am |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
|
|
Sorry, not sure how we got onto the subject of Steve Jobs here...? Back to the subject at hand. I've met Mick and he's a fantastic guy, and I'm very pleased the show committee has him on the case. They really are trying to make the best of a bad situation here, and I hope they can provide some clarity and confidence to exhibitors and attendees as best they can. Quote: Or perhaps tell them to pay any tariff bond or decline exhibiting and come for the show anyway Perhaps they'll eventually have to do this, but they're obviously reluctant to do so given the hit to attendance and the resulting impact on the financials. Lots of expensive commitments were made before the current hurricane blew ashore, so to speak. Quote: The show could offer to pay any tariffs that exhibitors may run afoul of. An interesting thought, but again, hard for the show organizers to make that commitment or not when the winds keep shifting and there's still a pervasive lack of clarity. Even though May's still several months away, many attendees (especially the international ones, for whom this topic is actually relevant) are budgeting and planning their travel now. Even if this headache goes away in a couple months' time, the damage might already be done. Let's hope not. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Sorry, not sure how we got onto the subject of Steve Jobs here...? Under the category of great leadership which clearly is sorely lacking for Boston 2026. A leader will hold the show and tell folks come or don't. Leadership makes decisions, it does not kick the problems down the road. The fact you don't recognize that just underscores my points. Edit to add: Quote: Perhaps they'll eventually have to do this, but they're obviously reluctant to do so given the hit to attendance and the resulting impact on the financials. Lots of expensive commitments were made before the current hurricane blew ashore, so to speak. Two words: Event Insurance. Two more words: Fertilizer happens. Quote: Even though May's still several months away, many attendees (especially the international ones, for whom this topic is actually relevant) are budgeting and planning their travel now. Even if this headache goes away in a couple months' time, the damage might already be done. Let's hope not. Great leadership would have made the decision now so plans could be made. All they have done is muddy the waters, hoping the problems will just disappear. Perhaps they waited too long to be proactive and now can only be reactive. Reactive is usually not a position of strength for a leader and here it is not working. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 09/23/2025 11:49 am |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
|
|
Quote: A leader will hold the show and tell folks come or don't. Leadership makes decisions, it does not kick the problems down the road. The fact you don't recognize that just underscores my points. OK, so please tell us what you would do if you were in charge. Just cancel the exhibits for international attendees? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Quote: OK, so please tell us what you would do if you were in charge. Just cancel the exhibits for international attendees? Make the best decision two months ago, stand by it and let the exhibitors decide. And many months ago consider a virtual competition category for exhibitors who will not send their hard copy exhibit. Also good high quality event insurance would be in hand long ago. The two wars and wide spread political unrest existed two weeks shy of two years ago. Competitions are held with whom ever shows up without regard as to why some chose not to show up. Edit to add: To be clear, now is too later for proactive action. Set the rules and dates then stand back, see who comes and run the show as is for those present. Can't do that? Then consider canceling the show and better luck next time. Now I got grief for my mention of great leadership by name. Now I will expect grief for mentioning this. The were the Olympic Games last year and will be again next year. They have been running well even after war cancellations, heinous terrorist attack, and two years of political boycotts. Fertilizer happens, plant and grow with it. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 09/23/2025 4:22 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
|
|
Well, many of these directives are often contradictory and temporary in nature. Interesting article from the WSJ, "The Race Back to America for a Plane Full of H-1B Workers" - lots of Indian nationals thought they'd be charged $100k to re-enter the US because of guidance from the Commerce Secretary. Turns out he was wrong, and that guidance was rescinded (while the plane was in-flight, as it turns out), so much ado about nothing at the end of the day. https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...hp_lead_pos3I think the committee's doing the best they can under the circumstances. I believe they're still looking for volunteers to join them, too, if you'd like to lend your expertise. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by gvol21 - 09/24/2025 09:02 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
At some point, one makes the decision on the information accessible at the moment the decision must be made and stands by it. So far the committee has not yet done that. Nor are they showing they are even considering the information know at the moment. To wit making date moves for reasons of being unclear but knowing that true clarity will not occur until after November 5, 2025. Additionally the imposed tariffs are in place for a maximum of 1 year under the rules applying to these, if legal, emergency tariffs.
No one can plan in their own best interest to attend until the committee final carves the rules in stone.
As to the example above, it would not have been news if the rules as the passengers understood them were not changed mid-flight. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
|
|
Quote: As to the example above, it would not have been news if the rules as the passengers understood them were not changed mid-flight. But the rules *did* change mid-flight, at which point many on the plane had already frantically moved around travel plans, etc. This is the problem: suddenly a gust blows from one direction, then abruptly it changes course. Lots of needless confusion and chaos in the process. I suppose there are two ways of dealing with it: either wait until more clarity comes (if it ever does), which the committee is doing, or just draw a line in the sand early on and let the chips fall where they may. Even if you're right, one can hardly fault the committee for trying to get as many people to visit and exhibit as possible, hence the wait-it-out approach. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1337 Posts |
|
|
The business decision-making that actually matters here is what caused the problems this stamp show is having. Those decisions were made very unwisely by Mr. Tariff, himself. That's worth discussing a lot more then worshipful descriptions of Steve Jobs.
But it is interesting to realize how Steve Jobs almost single-handedly created the modern world one brilliant business decision after another. But I wonder is this the same Steve Jobs who has been called "a manipulative, excitable liar who was cold, mean, and vindictive" to nearly everyone he dealt with?
From this, I found out that Steve Jobs, personally in his own pants pocket, discovered that unlike glass, plastic could easily be scratched. Who would have guessed? That plastic scratches easily had not even occurred to anyone in his entire company -- or to Jobs -- made it even more strange. Sorry, I meant to say even more "incompetent."
That his product, the iPhone, failed to work correctly but he went ahead and announced it to the world anyway made me realize . . . well, what's dishonest about that?
That in his presentation he was forced to use multiple iPhones to make it seem as if they worked properly is even more clever. What's dishonest about that? It's always impressive when we see clever business skills at work.
But I have to say the high point of the whole article was when Steve Jobs, American Hero, stood on that mountaintop with the lightening flashing behind him and said to the Corning Glass man, "Do not be afraid" like the Great Jehovah himself. I'm also impressed that Corning Glass figured out how to make glass screens and not just, you know, drinking glasses and mirrors and stuff.
Business does have a tendency to write its own history in this worshipful heroic manner. I'll be watching for the heroic stories celebrating America's favorite billionaires Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk as they slyly navigate the Trump Era in order to help protect our democracy. Oops, I meant to say "to insure even more massive incomes for themselves." Of course, if any of these guys had been stamp collectors, I might have paid even more attention. Does Elon Musk collect stamps, do you think? I think we should stick closer to stamp collecting.
As for the upcoming stamp show, as I said previously I still think it faces big issues that could damage it, all of them produced very unwisely by Mr. Tariff himself who thinks tariffs are not a tax on consumers and mistrusts foreigners so much he wants to harass as many of them as possible. We might as well mention the actual cause of the problems with the show, don't you think? Because without these polices, we'd be seeing no more problems than a stamp show normally has. None of this is necessary. Speaking of business decision-making as we are, we see in this microcosm of one little stamp show the results of bad decision-making -- very bad decisions which do great harm for little benefit. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by DrewM - 09/24/2025 6:50 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Quote: But the rules *did* change mid-flight, at which point many on the plane had already frantically moved around travel plans, etc. You see that as change. It is not as it was unknown when the passengers had to make a decision and in no way could be taken into account any more that the plane crashing en route killing all aboard. Additionally in the end the mid-flight rule change in no way affected the goals of the passengers,which was to get on American soil to avoid the need to make a payment they wished to avoid. They all achieved that goal. The only constant is change happens. Therefore, there is no reason to think a decision made today upon facts known will be the same decision if one waits until tomorrow. Fertilizer happens.Sometimes your best possible out come is successful failure.That successful failure incident's "sudden gust" occurred two years prior but was not known at decision time, when Apollo XIII lifted off. But the fertilizer was deatl with to a very rosy outcome. The longer the committee waits to make its decision the more decision making time it is stealing from the very folks they want to make plans and appropriate steps to attend. Likewise what about the folks who are going to be told, thank you for applying but sorry, no. Every delay by the committee eats up time those who will be turned away could have used to make appropriate plans in their lives.   It could not be that some exhibitors are just more equal, right? Edit for a missing t. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 09/25/2025 01:02 am |
|
Replies: 199 / Views: 24,849 |
|
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. | |

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use Advertise Here
|
| Stamp Community Forum |
© 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums |
| It took 0.26 seconds to lick this stamp. |
 |
|
|
|