Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Austria Telegraph Stamps Of 1874

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 3,470Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community

United States
507 Posts
Posted 02/05/2017   3:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add dkabq8 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Are Austria telegraph stamps listed in the Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue? I have looked though my 2009 Volume 1 and cannot find them.

Thanks for the help.
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 02/05/2017   4:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

No they are not.
This is what I have, may be helpful.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3185 Posts
Posted 02/05/2017   5:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have a couple of the 1870 stamps from the private Wiener Privat-Telegrafen-Gesellschaft company as listed in Hiscocks.

They both have the single cancellation line them just like the one in the Hiscocks illustration but I think they are nice looking stamps.

I'll scan them if and when I find them as currently they are not where I expected to find them!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3185 Posts
Posted 02/05/2017   5:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For many years the only catalogue for worldwide revenue stamps was the 1982 one by Steve Hiscocks.

A new expanded edition of this has been published by John Barefoot:

http://www.jbarefoot.co.uk/philatel...he-world.htm
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
6792 Posts
Posted 02/05/2017   9:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
From my collection --

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2013 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   12:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add area66 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod your paper is wrong , 1873 was Typo not Litho and 1874/75 was engraved, actually copper print and the one of floortrader look engraved , but the scan is not good enough to be sure , and they also look perf 12 or more the 1873 are only 9, 10½ or a combination of them.

They are in the Netto Katalok , THE reference
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by area66 - 02/06/2017 12:19 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   02:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Rod your paper is wrong , 1873 was Typo not Litho and 1874/75 was engraved,


Thank you.

Basically my paper is correct, apart from adding that Lithograph.
(and assuming the lithograph was included in the 1874 set)

I shall amend my page, and take out the lithograph example.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Norway
1661 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   06:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Blaamand to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod and Floortrader - it always amazes me what you guys can dig up from your collections. Very inspiring - thanks for sharing, as always.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
6792 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   07:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks BLAAMAND , I am just a worldwide collectors .
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2013 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   07:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add area66 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod they was no litho at all in 1974/75 , they was Engraved 9 copper) and for the SPECIMENT it's 50% if it's center and - 50% if above 75% more

so your SPECIMEN are - 50% not + 75 %


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by area66 - 02/06/2017 07:26 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3185 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   07:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I wouldn't get excited about the differences in pricing estimates between different catalogues for these kind of stamps.

In 1982 Hiscocks noted that Specimens "fetch perhaps 75% of mint prices", i.e. 25% less (or even less). Netto says 50% less. Same ball park.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 02/06/2017   2:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Yes, pricing always can be tricky, my information came from a collector,
and depends when he made the appraisal.

At best it can always be a guage.

For Australia, I use the 5/- Bridge, the 1972 Produce set, and the 1966 Antarctic set,
as a barometer, as to the current status.

For Turkey, I have been outbid in the past 30 auctions, for revenues, they sometimes reach $3 -$4 each, amazing to see an underground desire for these items.

It also depends on whom is buying and where from, I have seen a really poor set of Kemal Attaturk used definitives, sell for $25, which I appraised at $5 at best.
Sometimes there is no rhyme or reason.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3185 Posts
Posted 02/07/2017   4:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here are the two private Austrian telegraph stamps from 1870 that I mentioned.

They come from a set of five values in the same design.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 02/07/2017   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice scans Nigel.
Would you consider these as genuinely cancelled,
or the lines of remainders, preventing use?

Thanks for posting.

Update:
answering my own question. Remainders.
http://gb-precancels.org/Telegraphs/World/Ost.html

Webmaster has not seen a used cancel.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 02/07/2017 4:26 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3185 Posts
Posted 02/07/2017   4:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the link Rod. It's nice to see the colours of the other three values.

Hiscocks said that the only used stamps he has seen were just the lower halves and these are what he lists as "used".

I would guess that these will not be cancelled with a handstamp but probably just have the telegram details written by hand.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 02/07/2017   8:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

I was pondering the cost of a Telegraph in 1870.
I always watched with scepticism, when I saw a cowboy send a telegraph
on a TV serial.
Telegrams in my day, were dashed expensive.

Ergo, I was assuming the corollory that few of those stamps would be used.
They must be amongst the first telegraph stamps.


Anyhow decide for yourself. The GATU in circa 1870

http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/view...xt=odettepub


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 3,470Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05