Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Good Evening. What Scott # Is This Washington?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,613Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
247 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   02:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add NanoPhilatelic to your friends list Get a Link to this Message



Any help would be much appreciated.
Thank you.
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
247 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   02:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NanoPhilatelic to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think this is a #491. It has perf. 10
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
556 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   02:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Philazilla to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is an imperf 409 or 482 [depending on watermark] with fraudulent perforations. It is not a 491.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
247 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   03:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NanoPhilatelic to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Both of the perfs on each side look different.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
556 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   03:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Philazilla to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The perforations are perfect circles with no pressure ridges, and they are scissor- or blade-cut - the fraudster didn't even try to make the perf tips look right. Someone took a $1 stamp and did a bad job trying to make it look like a $12,500 stamp. This is a particularly bad fake. It is a damaged stamp. It is still good for postage though.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Philazilla - 08/14/2019 03:12 am
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   03:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stamperix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If that's a weak line in the right ribbon, it'a type III stamp which only comes with rotary stamps. Then it would have to be genuine perforation holes, so someone just cut by scissor.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
613 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   06:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add m and m to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
it is very bad fake perf job. a scan of the back should clear the air re flat or rotary.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   08:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The stamp is a common type III horizontal rotary press coil, either an unwatermarked Scott 492 or a watermarked Scott 455. Watermarks on this stamp may be difficult to spot in fluid. The perforations were sliced by an affixing or vending machine.

Coils were developed to enable businesses to efficiently attach stamps to marketing mail. Consumer use started with early postage vending machines.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by cfrphoto - 08/14/2019 08:35 am
Pillar Of The Community
5008 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   8:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree fully with cfrphoto. He is spot-on as usual.

There is nothing altered about your stamp. It is a perfectly legitimate Type III coil. The watermark will tell you which exact stamp you have. It went through one of the mechanical affixing machines of its day. One of the most common affixers was made by the Multipost Company of Rochester, NY.

Here is a picture of two similar affixers, the left is labeled "Made by Multipost Co. Rochester, N.Y." and the right one is labeled "Commercial Controls Corporation of Rochester, N.Y." but really the same item. The small button on the front is the screw-on cap for the water reservoir. Pushing the plunger down moistens, cuts and affixes a coil stamp.



Different views:



Patent listing on the back side of the Multipost affixer:



Business reply mail card c1930s:



2 covers mailed by Multipost with their affixed stamps:



Close-up of the 2 stamps from the covers above. Note the perforations are knife-cut and at the same slight angle at both left and right. Depending on the adjustment, stamps with 3 straight edges and one fully perforated side can be found.



Your original stamp is cut more straight than the Multipost examples, but still shows a slight slant evident in the red at the end of the perf tips at the lower right. It may have been affixed by a different brand of affixer, who knows, but the concept is still the same. Absent a cancel, yours was likely soaked from an unused prepaid reply envelope in hopes of later personal use.

Multipost also made more complicated mailing systems including privately applied cancels, too distant a tangent for this thread.

The Multipost technologies were largely replaced by meters. Some collectors consider the shortened knife-cut perforations to be damage while others consider it evidence of the evolution of mailing technology.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6499 Posts
Posted 08/14/2019   8:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Talk about painting a picture. What an informative post John, thank you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
556 Posts
Posted 08/16/2019   03:18 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Philazilla to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Awesome info John! Thanks!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,613Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05