Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Review Of Ultraviolet-Tools' Model M12

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 402Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts
Posted 08/19/2021   6:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add baker to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hopefully this will help someone considering UV lamps.

Review of Ultraviolet-Tools' Model m12, Enhanced 4-watt Shortwave/Longwave UV Lamp (filtered shortwave 254nm UV)

Recently I became interested in UV lamps, mainly to help in identification of some stamps. I am by no means a tagging expert not yet anyway. But not being able to inspect stamps for tagging, (or other things like paper, and repairs), means certain aspects of identification must be ignored. The Lighthouse L81 seemed like a good starter lamp, although at around $50-$70, it's a bit overpriced. After researching on this forum, asking questions, and doing other research, I settled on the m12 by Ultraviolet-Tools (https://www.ultraviolet-tools.com/), a company mentioned on the forum a number of times. I decided to post this review. First, here is UV-Tools' copy for the m12:

"Our beginners shortwave and longwave ultraviolet lamp. The shortwave UV is a enhanced four watt fluorescent tube emits the shortwave UV (254nm) specifically tuned to put out 40% more UV than other lamps of the same size. The longwave UV is emitted by a 375nm led putting longwave UV light.

Did you know 90% of fluorescent minerals require a filtered shortwave UV light? The optical filter is a specialized piece of glass on top of the lamp. DO NOT buy a lamp with just the bulb. You need the optical filter to block out the visible light generated by the bulb. The filter glass is the most expensive part of a shortwave UV lamp. Among fluorescent minerals other uses for this handy little lamp include stamp collecting, science experiments, counterfeit detection, and more.

Note: While the most affordable lamp on the market this lamp is not designed to be a field lamp. Our other shortwave lamps that are larger can be used out in the field. This lamp works well with rocks held in your hand within 12 inches.

Lamp Size: 6-1/2" x 2-1/4" x 3/4"
Wattage: Enhanced 4W
Bulb: Filtered Shortwave 254nm UV
Batteries Required: 4 AA (not included)
Weight: 5 ounces
Warranty: 90 Days

100% Satisfaction Guarantee!"

While the copy for this lamp mentions "stamp collecting," UV-Tools stock-in-trade is minerals and lamps for the geology enthusiast. The m12 appears to be identical to the Lighthouse L81, at least as pictured. The price of the m12 at the time of this writing is $39.99. I've seen the L81 selling for significantly more. At this price point, I wasn't expecting perfect fit and finish, and accordingly, didn't get it. As a "beginner" model, and low power lamp, this would probably meet the needs of most people. I expect that tagging specialists might want to up their UV-lamp game though. I also picked up a pair of their UV protective glasses for $8.00. These are Pyramex brand "Intruder" S11040S. (The glasses are included with the 11 watt m100HO. To me the 11 watt seemed like overkill in terms of power.) I figured safety glasses would not hurt, and may help. UV is dangerous if misused. Note that these glasses do not fit over existing spectacles, but over-the-spectacles designs exist. No one should be looking directly into a UV lamp. In the paper "Stamps That Glow," (https://stamps.org/Portals/0/adam/N...volution.pdf Henry I Jehan Jr. put it this way:

"WARNING
Never look directly into the light emitted by a UV lamp!
Direct exposure to UV light, particularly short wave UV light (UV-B),
will do permanent damage to your eyes.
When working with UV light source, you should always wear glasses
containing a UV blocker.

#9679; The light emitted by the stamps when illuminated with UV
light is eye-safe.
#9679; It is the UV light source used to illuminate the stamps
that is not eye-safe.
#9679; Do not look into the UV light source, or allow it to be
reflected into your eyes
by stamp mounts or other mirror surfaces.
#9679; With eye protection, working with tagged stamps is
perfectly safe.
If you work extensively with the UV light for long periods
of time, you should
consider wearing gloves and long sleeve shirts to limit
skin exposure and
prevent sunburn and related ill effects."

The m12 sports a small kick-stand in the back which allows it to stand on its own (see fig. 1). However, the shortwave UV would now be facing upwards. I'm more in favor of moving the lamp to the stamp with the lamp facing downwards, thereby helping to eliminate the chance of looking into the UV source. This lamp also has a wrist strap. This might come in handy when on a show floor, but I doubt I would walk around with this lamp dangling from my wrist.

Fig. 1

The switch seems to be a weak point in the whole design. The switch operates by moving to one side for shortwave, and the other side for longwave. The center position is OFF. The problem encountered was that the shortwave can turn on with a little more than a touch. This means the user must slide the switch back towards longwave to ensure that the lamp is really off. I expect that at the very least, it would run the batteries down, and subject the bulb to unnecessary wear. Even worse, if it's on and facing the user, they may not realize they are looking into the source. I saw at least one buyer's review who remarked on this same issue. Yet, that was a review for the Lighthouse L81. Hmmm. So far, I decided to use extra care to make sure the lamp is off, and then slide it back into its cardboard box when not in use. The switch problem may be fixable but would require disassembly of the unit. In the meantime, it works. (One idea would be to ditch the wrist strap and that could help fund a better switch.)

For this review, I'm reviewing the shortwave tagging only. There are some uses of longwave, such as detecting certain papers, or repairs. I decided on the dual-wave model so I'd have longwave if I need it.

The m12 in use:

The m12 is easy to use. In her article "Turn on the glowing stamp magic with an ultraviolet lamp," (https://www.linns.com/news/postal-u...t-lamp.html) Janet Klug provides a good basic technique for checking luminescence:

"To check luminescence with a UV lamp, set out the stamps you want to check in a work area that can be darkened.
Once the stamps are arranged on the work surface, turn off all the lights in the room and, if daylight is a problem, draw the drapes. Turn on the UV lamp. Make your observations quickly, and jot them down. Little sticky notes work perfectly because they will stick to the work surface rather than float to the floor on an errant breeze.
When the observations have been made and noted, switch off the UV lamp and turn on the ordinary lights. Working in short spurts is better for your eyes and will help keep the UV lamp in good operating order for a longer period."

Turning off the lights is a key step. I'm not sure if it's the relative low power of the m12 (4 watts), but with the room lights on, it's difficult to see anything. However, the examples I'm providing were made with the room lights off but with ambient daylight coming through the window, so it was by no means completely dark. I thought the results were more than adequate.

Ultraviolet-Tools included a couple of minerals, and also Scott 3274 to let you start checking luminescence immediately. Figure 2 shows 3274 under shortwave. This (as with the other pictures) was done in a room with the lights off during the day. The room was dark, but not completely. For my purposes, this result is fine.
Fig. 2


Below are figs. 3, and 3a which show the included mineral in normal light, and then under shortwave UV. The result is striking.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3a


Next up, fig. 4, Scott 1689a. Very good result. Bonus: I can imagine that I'm surveilling Washington's party with night vision goggles.
Fig. 4


Klug mentioned a few aspects of tagging in non-US stamps, and called out Canadian stamps in particular for their bright edge-tagging. The result in fig. 5 does not disappoint.
Fig. 5


Finally, fig. 6, Scott 2281. I was casting around randomly looking for good examples, and found this $0.25 bee stamp with what looks to me like a tagging shift. Some tagging "oddities" may have value, but I suspect many shifts like this are fairly common. I don't believe that a shift would interfere with the taggant's function. Yet, tagging varieties provide a good opportunity for a specialized collection.
Fig. 6

Verdict on the m12:
Since I just received this lamp, I can't remark on the durability of the components. The fit and finish is just OK, but it's a low-end lamp. The switch needs a re-design to make sure this component works properly. The shortwave results are more than acceptable. I have no practical experience with other lamps, but I can't see how the results could be better. For an inexpensive dual-lamp, so far, I'm happy with the Ultraviolet-Tools model m12.







Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
7719 Posts
Posted 08/19/2021   7:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I like this lamp and use one when I am away from home. The portabillity is very nice. The batteries do not last long however and rechargable ones are disappointing.


Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1229 Posts
Posted 08/19/2021   11:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add No1philatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Peter, I noticed the short life of most batteries in these units. When getting rechargeable batteries for your blacklight, probably AA, look to purchase higher milliamp hours (MAH), as the higher the capicity, the longer they will last before recharging. Regular 1000, 1200 even 1600mah is not much. If you get the 2400 or better still the 2800mah ones you will see a marked difference. Dont waste charging cycles by recharging if you only used it for a short time as they only have so many life cycles and will actually shorten the life.

You will know when to charge if it is slow to illuminate or the light is getting dull. Higher MAH rechargeable batteries may cost a couple dollars more than standard recharagables but will definetly be worth it. So combined with the not having to recharge as often as well as the extended useful on time will make using them much more enjoyable. The only downfall is that it usually is a bit longer charge time.

Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by No1philatelist - 08/19/2021 11:18 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3203 Posts
Posted 08/20/2021   06:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angore to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
thanks for the review.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Al
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   08:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mstocky2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
All of the small units like the one you show, including the name brand are the same. The switch is definitely the weak point on these. That is how I know the cheaper ones and name brand are the same after opening several of them. For casual user these units work fine. I scan tens of thousands of stamps so I went through a number of these. Final dug out the soldering iron and put a real slide switch in one and haven't bought a new one since.

Switch aside they light itself works well. All of the images I took for the stampsmarter tagging database were done with the 4W units.

I have the 11W unit as well and now use that for bulk sorting.

One key things to avoid with all these battery units is to avoid constantly turning them on and off. If you do this a lot, the end of the bulb will silver making the lamp harder and harder to start. This issue can be mistaken for low batteries as replacing with new batteries can help for awhile. If sorting at home, better to leave the light on and set to side out of view while swapping or looking for new stamps to view. If the lamp gets progressively harder to start, check the bulb for highly silvered glass near the lamp end. Usually one end is silvered much more then the other. Try swapping end for end to get more life out of the bulb.

Both the 4W and 11W use very common germicide bulbs so no need to buy expensive name brand replacements like Leuchtturm. Small units use a G4T5 bulb.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
9902 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   08:31 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I concur with Mark's comments. UV bulbs are notorious for suffering when power cycled often and/or subjected to vibrations (when buying, try to avoid going through multiple resellers with their associated extra shipping). And like all bulbs, keep in mind that they have a finite life and their performance deteriorates with the passing of time and use.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   11:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add baker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
These are very helpful remarks. I imagine most bulbs wear out by power cycles. The quality of the bulb probably plays a role as well. Doing further research, I found the Mineralab website. They said (https://www.mineralab.com/AboutUVLamps/:

Shortwave filters, which often have highly polished surfaces, will deteriorate over time from exposure to the very Shortwave light they are filtering, a process called solarization. Long exposure to humidity will also damage Shortwave filters. After about 1 to 5 months of continuous use, the filter's transmission drops to about 25%, so your mineral collection, for instance, will not fluoresce as brightly. Thus, a Shortwave filter should be replaced when spent.

In contrast to the life of Shortwave filters, UV light bulbs last a very long time. However, the phosphors in a Longwave bulb can deteriorate with time, so if your Longwave fluorescence appears dull, you may want to replace the bulb. If your Shortwave fluorescence is dull, replace your filter before replacing the bulb because the bulb will withstand the effects of solarization perhaps 50 times longer than will the filter.


This suggests that a loss of SW brightness may in fact be the filter, not the bulb. It would probably not be worth replacing components on an inexpensive lamp like this though.

The takeaway, as has been mentioned, is to at least try to tag in batches to minimize power cycles. Although leaving the power on may reduce power cycles, it also increases solarization. Can't win...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2570 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   5:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The case for the M-12 and the more expensive version looks identical to the current Lighthouse lamp as well as those sold by others.

With your examples, it lives up to UV-Tools billing where the shortwave is strong despite the necessary filtering.

I wouldn't worry that much about useful bulb lifetime. It's probably going to be years before replacement will be needed. The batteries, rechargeable or not, will probably cost you more over that time.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   6:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add baker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Either way, I'm not worrying about it. I know some people don't care, and ignore tagging issues completely. For me, I don't like not being able to examine for tagging. When looking at the Mineralab website, I saw a mini-darkroom thing with a 4W lamp which seems to have solved the problem of any dangerous UV getting to your eyes. $650 takes it! A little to rich for my blood.

I'm a musician too, and in those forums, a popular topic is "GAS" - gear acquisition syndrome. I'm glad to see that "GAS" is alive and well in stamp collecting.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2570 Posts
Posted 08/21/2021   8:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The big units that are used to check for venue re-entry handstamps are in the same price range. Those are in everyday use and last for quite a long time. They're used by some stamp dealers but there's no shortwave filter (I suppose you could buy one) and not very portable.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 402Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2021 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2021 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05