Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

GB : The Prince Albert Stamps 1840.

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 6,902Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38168 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   03:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rod222 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Acknowledgement : The Stamp Collectors Magazine 1863

(Prince Albert was Queen Victoria's husband)

Note: All British monarchs on stamps face left,
from my investigations in the past, only two
SG493 KG6 and SG534 QE2 face right and frontal respectively.









The stamp :



*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
658 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   04:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampStudy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great read rod, I have always been fascinated by the consort essays - Further info on wikipedia :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Consort_Essay

Drew

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38168 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   04:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I knew nothing of them before today Drew,
only after I read the 1863 paper. :)
All I recall, is that Queen was besotted by him.

I found it intriguing with regards the vendors commission
on the selvedge

Wow! nice piece by Wiki..Thanks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 07/12/2010 04:57 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   05:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rohumpy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I for one, as a GB collector, am glad these did not become an issued stamp. I realize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but to me they are just plain ugly.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
658 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   06:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampStudy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think thats the appeal - they were never issued, I'm a sucker for stamps that you don't see very often and have an interesting story attached : the 00p machins and withdrawn bible society stamp from South Africa to name a couple that I completely drool for. None of them particularly beautiful but I'm like gambling addict when I see these.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
658 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   06:45 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampStudy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6191 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   07:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Londonbus1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the 00p machins and withdrawn bible society stamp from South Africa to name a couple that I completely drool for. None of them particularly beautiful


But Drew, the 00p machins ARE beautiful. Very beautiful.

Londonbus1....at least to me !
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   08:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rohumpy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Any chance of an image of the South Africa bible society stamp(s). I tried ebay, but no luck.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
658 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   09:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampStudy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Due to religious objections the 40c stamp was withdrawn. Post offices were instructed to withdraw the stamp but over 1500 stamps, first day covers and control blocks were sold to the public. The remainding stamps were destroyed.



The rest of the set



Drew
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by StampStudy - 07/06/2012 10:59 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38168 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   09:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Drew,
correspondence reply to the original article,
just in case you are interested.






Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 07/12/2010 09:15 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
658 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   09:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampStudy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If there was a thank you button I would press it .... I wish I had two sheets of the consorts :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
38168 Posts
Posted 07/12/2010   6:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, well, this is a case for "facsimile man"
I print out out colour copies of the stamps
with adjacent history notes.
They make fabulous information pages in an album.

"virtual" collecting is not for the timid.
but conforms well with your avatar "stamp study"


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2880 Posts
Posted 07/06/2012   12:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for your edit, Stampstudy, and resurrection of this thread. There is so much to learn! The images and articles are a welcome addition to my digital reference library!

Brian
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3687 Posts
Posted 02/03/2018   7:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here are some current links to the G.B. Prince Consort essay stamps. However, I am confused as to whether they were surface (lithography) printed or letterpress (relief) printed.

http://postalheritage.org.uk/collec..._P_141_22_02

http://postalheritage.org.uk/collec..._P_141_22_03

https://www.collectors-club-of-grea...onsort-essay

http://pennyblackstore.blogspot.com...rations.html

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3179 Posts
Posted 02/03/2018   8:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi jogil,

We seem to be using these words differently, but for me these stamps are surface-printed (= letterpress = typo.) as opposed to litho.

"Surface printed" is the traditional term for the non-engraved, non-embossed Victorian British stamps.

Scott refers to them as "typo."

I expect a printer would call them "letterpress".

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Edited by nigelc - 02/03/2018 8:25 pm
Pillar Of The Community
3687 Posts
Posted 02/03/2018   9:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi nigelc: My interest in this is that it appears to be the first attempt at trying dry printing on dry pregummed paper. Thus, the letterpress stamps were the first to be dry printed and India Scott # 31, Stanley Gibbons # 75, 76 is the first such fully issued stamp. It was much easier to dry print letterpress stamps that it was to dry print engraved stamps so that it happened earlier with letterpress stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 02/03/2018 9:42 pm
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 6,902Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05