Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Confirmation Requested For W. A. Postmark 3B-B On W. A. Sg143

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 479Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
877 Posts
Posted 01/06/2026   05:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add itma to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
It would be appreciated if one (or more) of the postmark people could confirm that this postmark is from PEAK HILL Type 3b-b.
Send note to Staff
Edited by itma - 01/06/2026 05:26 am

Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts
Posted 01/07/2026   8:07 pm  Show Profile Check fairdinkumstamps's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add fairdinkumstamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Itma,
The best suggestion I can make to check on this postmark is to contact the Western Australian Study Group here: https://www.wastudygroup.com/contact-us/

It certainly looks like the 3b-b but, as you pointed out on page 4 of the Western Australian Postmarks thread, the day and month are transposed compared to the Study Group's illustrated example.

Please also post any updates on the Western Australian Postmarks thread if new information comes to light.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories.
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
877 Posts
Posted 01/08/2026   07:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add itma to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, fds. WASG contacted as suggested.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by itma - 01/08/2026 07:16 am
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
877 Posts
Posted 01/13/2026   06:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add itma to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
All (and more) is revealed very completely, with many thanks to Malcolm Brown and the WA Study Group.

Quote:
Quote

Hi Frank,
Thanks for getting in touch with the Western Australia Study Group.

With your question regarding the Peak Hill postmark, you are correct in saying that it was normal for the month to be before the day. It is however also found with day before the month.

I have attached a photo of the type 3b postmarking implement for your reference, and this may help in your understanding. (This one is for Greenhills, Western Australia.). When viewing the postmarker, you can see 4 slots for where the postal clerk needs to insert the slugs. The Index (or code) number goes at the top, with the month and day slugs in the centre 2 slots, and the year at the base. Sometimes errors occurred with the day and month inserted vice-versa, as well as other insertion errors too.
It is easy to see how these insertion errors occurred, as when the clerk was inserting the slugs, the cds is viewed back to front. The slugs needed to be inserted in reverse when looking at the cds so that when the striker was turned over for use they were then in the correct position.

In viewing the Greenhills implement attached, the August month slug is still in the cds on the left hand side. This is actually in the wrong position. If this striker was to be used as is, then when the striker is turned over for use, the month would be after the day.

I have shown a few types of errors in another scan attached to this email:
Top left shows a correct setting with index #, Month and day and year all in their rightful places.
The strike on the 5d swan shows incorrect year in the index # position.
The strike on the 4d swan shows month before day.
The strike on the 1d swan shows day before month.
All these are 3b-b cancels struck with the Peak Hill 3b-b postmarking device.

The varieties of these clerk insertion errors are fun to collect, and help broaden ones postmark collection.

I trust this helps in answering your enquiry,and please don't hesitate to contact me for any further questions on WA postmarks or philately.

Best wishes for 2026, and I hope the year brings many WA gems for your collection.

Cheers.
Malcolm Brown for the WA Study Group.




Quote:
Unquote
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts
Posted 01/13/2026   8:20 pm  Show Profile Check fairdinkumstamps's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add fairdinkumstamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Excellent result Itma - I have reposted this information on the Postmarks of Western Australia thread.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 479Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05