Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Ecuador ID Assistance Requested

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,052Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   07:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add smauggie to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi guys,

I am having a hard time finding these two in the Scott catalog. Any idea of a catalog number/value?



These are from an album of a friend of mine that he inherited from his father. I am evaluating it for him. I will admit it has been quite fun and educational.

Thanks!
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1361 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   07:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add AnthonyUK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The first is possibly a revenue (maybe overstamped for postal use) and is Scott#484 and the 2nd looks to be Air Post #C235.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by AnthonyUK - 12/01/2010 08:07 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   09:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Spot on, thanks Anthony.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   12:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bujutsu to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi All

Ecuador did overprint a lot of "Postal Tax" stamps with "POSTAL" so that these stamps could be used (valid) for regular postages services.

I am not sure if they did it because there was a shortage of other regular stamps or not?

Chimo

Bujutsu
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   12:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I noticed that when going through the catalog and wondered the same thing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts
Posted 12/01/2010   7:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 22crows to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here's a Linns Refresher Course about the Ecuador overprints that may be of interest:

http://www.linns.com/howto/refreshe...rcourse.aspx
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts
Posted 12/02/2010   11:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bujutsu to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the Linns Refresher 22crows

After reading it, it makes the topic a lot more clear.

Chimo

Bujutsu
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/16/2018   9:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Note : Bumped thread.

Unknown Revenue : Not listed in Scott or Forbin.
Perhaps Yvert / Tellier ?
Overprint : Centenario Guayaquil 1919-1920
Central perforation to allow 2 x 10c?



Hipstamp ID C416 incorrect


Hipstamp ID "T824" (unknown catalogue)

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/16/2018 9:32 pm
Pillar Of The Community
France, Metropolitan
3744 Posts
Posted 11/17/2018   08:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add perf12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Local tax stamp -Translation from the link below:
Juan Pablo Aguilar Andrade


Many will have seen the fiscal and telegraphic stamps resealed with the Centennial inscription of Guayaquil, and with the indication of several biennia.

In the catalog of Olamo's Ecuadorian tax stamps, these stamps are included among the general stamps and the author indicates that the reason for the issue is unknown; adds the fact that in 1920 it was the year in which the centenary of the independence of Guayaquil was fulfilled.

For its part, S.E.R. Hiscocks includes, in its catalog of telegraphic stamps, six stamps with the indicated stamp, due to the fact that the latter was placed on telegraphic stamps. The same happens in the Barefoot catalog.

In reality, the centennial stamps of Guayaquil are fiscal, not telegraphic, but they must be classified as additional stamps and not among the general stamps.

In fact, after 1884, Ecuador established the mobile stamp tax, by virtue of which certain documents (for example, checks, receipts or contracts) had to pay a tribute, through the fixation in them of one or more stamps. which represented the value paid. This is the general stamp tax, which was in force until the end of the 1980s. The name mobile stamp was because it could be placed on any document, which differentiated it from stamped paper or fixed stamp, in which the stamp was printed on the document and could only be used with paper.

From the second decade of the twentieth century began to establish additional taxes to stamps, that is, taxes that were also paid by setting stamps on documents. In certain cases, the general stamp tax and an additional amount that appeared on a stamp other than the general prosecutor's office were to be paid.

In 1919, as the celebration of the centennial of Guayaquil's independence, which was being held on October 9, 1920, approached, Congress decided to create a source of funding for the celebration. For this purpose, in November 1919 the Legislative Decree was enacted, which established a tax that should be collected exclusively in the province of Guayas, in the documents levied with the general stamp tax, except for those of customs.

Six values #8203;#8203;were set for the stamps: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 cents and it was determined in which documents each of them would go.

A stamp specially dedicated to the payment of the tax was never printed and recourse was made to the stamp of fiscal and telegraphic stamps.

Several stamps were issued resealed between 1920 and 1924. The tax, therefore, continued charging several years after the celebration that gave rise to it. Disappeared after 1925, as consecu

http://actualidadfilatelica.blogspo...mpuesto.html

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/17/2018   3:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Perf 12, many thanks. Appreciated.



Bisect perforation perhaps intentional,
found this hiding in my database, not my stamp.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/17/2018 4:00 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,052Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05