Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

What Kind Of British Cancel Is This?

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 4,200Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/02/2011   8:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jimjamtwo to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Does anyone know what kind of cancel this is? I think they're both Birmingham (1938/1939), but they don't look like any other British cancels I have. Does anyone know what kind of cancel this was?





Thanks for looking!
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/02/2011   11:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nothing in my box of tricks.

Perhaps a "skeleton" postmark of Birmingham?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/02/2011   11:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It occurred to me today that as both cancels are on brown paper, perhaps this was a special parcel cancellation.

I read somewhere that as parcel packaging is not often preserved, such cancels are not often seen.

Would this make sense?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
28 Posts
Posted 12/03/2011   07:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bayman52 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi, just had a look through Whitney 7th edit. The only things similar are the Blackwell type rubber handstamps of this period. Handstamped because the impressions are slightly blurred. If the paper is slightly thicker than what you would expect for a normal envelope then its a good chance it was off a larger type or a parcel.

Except that 1 1/2d postage is the standard letter rate from 1923 to 1940, and on the second the 4 1/2d is too low for a parcel which had started at 6d since 1935. Probably they are from larger envelopes with a rate fixed by the weight of the contents, maybe for printed papers.
Regards.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/03/2011   09:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Parcel hammers were indeed rubber,
they were often preserved, I have squillions
Rubber parcel handstamps generally are concentric rings
with 2 horizontal bars with the name of the office
no date included.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/03/2011   4:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It would seem that these aren't parcel cancels, certainly not regular ones anyway.

Thanks for the comments, rod222, bayman52!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/03/2011   10:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

One can never be dogmatic in Philately
there are just about always exceptions.

Takes this bouquet-garni of Parcel ephemera

there are parcel postmarks similar to yours.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/04/2011   04:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
On the Guernsey page, yes.

Interesting.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/13/2011   01:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
How about this one? What kind of cancel was this?



Also on cancels: wasn't the era of KGVI a bit late for numeral cancels? Or did their use linger on in many parts of the country? This one would date from 1938/39:


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/13/2011   01:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The first NPB = Newspaper Branch
the second a duplex 84
I'll have to look up the number for corresponding town.

84 = Cantebury Kent
(although I would defer to Nigelc for confirmation,
I am not entirely confident of my records)


Yours is type 48
half the alphabet was apparently used
so "O" seems very late



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/13/2011 02:03 am
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 12/13/2011   01:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks re the NPB.

I haven't been able to find out what the duplex 84 was - all the references to this number I can find online are to a much earlier period.

The question for me is whether numeral cancels were much in use by the end of the '30s. I would have thought their use was very uncommon by this date.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jimjamtwo - 12/13/2011 5:59 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 12/13/2011   10:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rodney's spot on, 84 = Canterbury. Some of these old postmarks can be found on QEII stamps as well as GVI ones.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/14/2011   01:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Yes, Nigel, I am currently mounting Canada
and noted a barred mute killer on a 1955 issue.
Looked kinda out of place.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
28 Posts
Posted 12/14/2011   6:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bayman52 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
NPB postmark Fernau 48 as Rod has said, and similar to 49. Pictures for basic info only. Trying to find the rest.






84 is Canterbury, a 4 barred postmark (4 bars above and below the number) is listed as late as 1949, so your 3 bars is something of a rarity!!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 01/04/2012   01:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the info, bayman52!

Another question regarding British cancels: was there a reason for the adoption of a duplex cancel with smaller numbers inside a diamond shape? This is the only such cancel I've got in my collection, so I'm a little curious.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 01/04/2012   04:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Just the evolution of a process.

What you have is
London : Inland Section
Horizontal oval with a number in a diamond
numbers range from 1 to 107
CV $1.75
datestamp with double circle CV $4.50

Type number 106
Your numeral 105 is Bracknell in Berkshire I think.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 4,200Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05