Today is question day for me - this pair was pulled out of my kiloware box from several years ago. I think it's the later pair since the R in Africa appears to have a straight leg rather than the curved leg of the earlier version, but I don't have a decent reference for this. Can anyone help on this? It's fine either way as both pairs are close in value, but the later one is a tad bit higher than the earlier one. I'm not actively collecting South Africa but I do end up with them in my kilo purchases on a regular basis.
Rod, that link is great - once I could see the variations, it was easy to pin it down. A bit of confusion though, as the site shows the pair labeled as 1948 being scott #49 while the Scott catalog shows this stamp as being from. Since mine appears to be a 1940 postmark and its coloring is a good match for the 1940 version, I'm going to put it down as Sc#49 from 1940, assuming that the Scott catalog date is correct.
That's a really useful link, thankyou! I was struggling with matching my stamps to the grainy black and white images in my (rather old) SG Commonwealth catalogue and gave up in frustration. Maybe I'll tackle them again...
That makes two of Us :) South Africa is one of my last countries to begin to mount, I have boxes of them, but keep putting them off due to their difficulty.
I figure for the time it takes, you kinda want to do it well, I have been putting it off waiting for a SG concise catalogue but they have been expensive.
I recall my first attempt, I gave up at the "orange tree" that confused the socks off me.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here