Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

You Can Get Away With A Lot When You Have A Postage Meter!

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 11,730Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
United States
599 Posts
Posted 01/01/2013   5:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jobi01 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Technically "DO NOT BEND" automatically means non-machinable surcharge. We need to mark items "DO NOT FOLD". A certain radius of bending occurs in the automated machinery. Most bending problems are due to human handling and, yes, each individual post office clerk seems to have their own interpretation.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2779 Posts
Posted 01/01/2013   5:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Battlestamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
jobi01: Actually the language in the DMM (Domestic Mail Manual) of the USPS concerning "Do Not Bend" marked on packages does not imply any form of surcharge fees. The part of the DMM was struck out some years ago although a few clerks hold on to it. "Do not bend" doesn't mean automatic parcel rates like the forementioned clerk in Albany thought.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/01/2013   6:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"DO NOT BEND" has various interpretations and the problem is that USPS website search function brings up a number of obsolete "hits" about that statement. I believe this Postal Bulletin reference from 2007 adequately identifies the current regulation about use of the "DO NOT BEND" designation:



For those interested in demonstrating the "flexibility test", it is illustrated on pages 3-5 at this link as Exhibit 2.2a through 2.2c:

http://pe.usps.com/archive/pdf/dmma...0514/101.pdf
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts
Posted 01/01/2013   6:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add doug2222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Machinability is a money-grubbing RACKET. We got along fine without it for more than a century...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/29/2013   10:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm sure these "junk mail" items were mailed in the 10s or 100s of thousands. However, I suspect even though they use the "DO NOT BEND" reference, they never paid any kind of a surcharge for it; in fact, they probably got a sizable discount on the high volume mailing:

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 11,730Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05