Need Help Id'ing Netherland Modern Stamps

Looking for some help ID'ing these Netherlands stamps.
Any help would be appreciated. Also note
the blue Queen Wilhelmina stamp, which is similar to the brown/black Scott #287.
Thanks
Art

Scott nr. - (year)
531 (1975)
935 (1996)
591 (1979)
851 (1994)
522 (1975)
1000 (1998)
530 (1975)
B610 (1984)
B304 (1956)
1017 (1998)
B709-B710 (1998)

The Queen Wilhelmina is #301 issued in 1948.
The others so far:
531,935,?,591,?
?,522,1000,530
?,?
?,B304,1017, 961 x2

The rest (?s) I either can't see, or are too new for my 2003 catalogue.


12 minutes too slow.

With all due respect Art but you don't seem to a clue how to find any info about stamps, most of which are very easy to find in Scott or any other catalogue even for a novice collector.

Yet you sell on ebay as you mentioned on a previous post.

How do you do it?

Lithograving:
For your information, I have researched thousands of stamps and catalogued and priced them. These Netherland stamps are the remnants of a few hundred. I use Scott's as well as EZ Stamp and called it a day for the rest. Quite frankly, sir, I really don't appreciate your comment and would appreciate it, in the future, to keep them to yourself. You are not very representive of the quality of folks on this forum.

Well I certainly don't bother people about things I can easily find
by a bit of research in a CATALOGUE.

Please - this is not Stampboards, where rudeness is expected and accepted.

Stamp 3 on the 1st line (the Delft tile) was issued in 1998 and is SG1868.
Stamp 5 on the 1st line (Gilded coach) was issued as one of two stamps in a mini-sheet (SG M1893).
Perhaps someone could translate these into Scott numbers.

It is nice to see stamps and cancels of any stamps to me.

I appreciate a good stamp, and I know that the meaning of the phrase good stamp will differ amonst the stamp collecting community.

My dear lady if you're referring to me then please explain yourself.

I simply stated a fact and if it bothers you, too bad.

I certainly don't need lessons in etiquette from you.

We've been through this before.

Nobody is required to ID anybody's stamps.

If you want to help out, then post some ID's (yeah, sometimes it can be "off to the races").

If for some reason you think someone is taking advantage or just being lazy, or you just aren't interested in doing the IDs, you are free to ignore and go to another thread.

I've IDed quite a few stamps and I've also deliberately skipped a few ID threads in my time here. I don't think it is that big of a deal.

Have fun. If you don't think it's fun, then jump into another thread. There's plenty of them on SCF! It's like skipping a few items in the buffet line.

k

No. 4 of the first line is SC #984, No. 5 of first line is 1006b, and the fourth and fifth item on row 4 is #961.

I have reviewed those stamps that, upon analysis, were identifiable. It appears about 35% of them were, either because they were, in fact, pictured, or because a similar, but not identical picture would have been the tip-off. In other cases, the font was the same, or the description was the clue. All have now been identified, Thanks to all who helped on this thread.

Jorgesurcl:
How did you do the overlays? Neat.
Thanks

Art, simply using the "PAINT"
I copied and saved your image on mi PC.
Then I opened it with PAINT and added a blank side to write the numbers (in yellow).
Then I was dragging the numbers one by one over the stamps, leaving them with transparent (clear) background.
I delete the blank side and ready!

Slick. I can use that.
Thanks much.