I've seen a couple of these with orange ink on the back. I read somewhere this can happen when the ink is still a bit wet and the sheet above is pressed on top. But I would expect to see that on the gum, and not on the paper itself. Unless they gummed after printing?
The later 3c SQ used an aniline ink (vermillion colour). This ink tended to bleed through and is often visible on the back. The paper was not a very good quality either - thin.
What you are referring to is called OFFSET and occurs as you stated.
Small Queens were printed on dampened paper that was later gummed as a secondary process.
Stamps with offset images on the back are not uncommon and were frequently caused by a residue of ink on the press platen deposited when the press was inadvertently closed without a sheet of paper being printed. The next sheet was printed properly on the front but received an offset image on the back at the same time.
gportch, in all my reading I have never heard of that cause before, though it certainly makes sense. The only cause I ever heard was the stacking of sheets when the ink on the sheet below was still somewhat wet. Can I ask where you heard about this (if you recall)?
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here