Quote:If Amos and other catalog publishers can't develop this quickly and on their own, they will be faced with having to cut a deal with
ebay.
Don
ebay could, but do they want to? If they thought it was worth their while (if they've even thought of it at all), they'd probably already be working on it, regardless of where Amos was at in the process. I just don't think
ebay, being the behemoth that they are, will want to mess around with niche hobby tools and publishing. I could be wrong.
Now...selling their images and data would be another thing, but
ebay's raw data would hardly be clean and would need a considerable scrubbing, at least for some countries. They don't have a field to input a catalog publisher and number, so I assume they couldn't query by Scott# and they'd have to go off of information in titles and descriptions.
This is where their lack of subdivisions within stamp categories is a problem. For example, in
ebay's Germany category, just searching for Scott 25 could pull up Scott 25 for Germany, GDR, Danzig, Memel, Saar, and any number of states and plebiscites, occupations, etc. Not to mention you might also find results for
Michel 25 or SG 25 for any of those stamp issuing entities. Searching for a specific stamp by Scott# in
ebay's Germany category is a total crapshoot, even with advanced search features, and scrolling through dozens and dozens of unrelated stamps is par for the course. I'd think that the data within the Germany category would be among the worst examples of problematic data, but I'm sure there are many other areas of philately that would be similar.
If
ebay were serious about something like this (or indeed just improving their stamps category in general), they'd have a field where you could input a catalog number and a catalog publisher. Then they'd be able to capture and filter that data easily. I wonder if there might be a copyright issue with this or else I'd think
ebay would already ask for this information to help with search results.