Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help Need To Verify The Color On Jackson 2c 1870-71 Issue

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 4,472Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member

Australia
26 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   04:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add randeni to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello all members,

This is my first post and the question is not an easy one. I found this post card with 2c Jackson on it. The postcard dated 1877 and addressed to Germany.
Firstly I am confused with the secret mark, as per Scott 1947 publication there is a diagonal line under the scroll at the left of "U.S.", has any one have clear idea or picture of it? I know it seldom show clearly, but I can see clear diagonal marking between the letters "U and S", so is that what it is or something else?

Secondly the colour, in bold areas it looks like carmine-vermilion but the rest is vermilion or orange-vermilion. So how we check the colour? compare with lighter area or bold area?

And then the paper looks to me as white wove paper ( since they all printed on a white or yellowish wove paper ), so it cannot be 178 as the paper is yellowish, and it's not 168 as the colour is brown, and it's not 135 or 146 as those shades are brown.

So the question is could this be #180? as the stamp issued for 1876 Centennial Exposition and the date on the card suggest 7th October 1877? posted on 8th at St Louis.

awaiting your valuable comments on this.
please look at the other two stamps as well one is shade of brown and the other dull vermilion.

N.B.
Can anyone recognize the bold numerical cancellation on the middle stamp.

Please note the postcard tide with only single stamp and I have placed two other similar stamp for comparison which are from my collection and two different shades.

cheers

randeni










This image of #180 just found on an action site

Send note to Staff
Edited by randeni - 08/18/2014 08:15 am

Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   05:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
OOOPS
I think I posted above in the wrong Forum. I hope the administration can correct it..

cheers
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   06:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
2 of the 3 are not original to the document as ca be seen by the partial non-tied fancy cancels. Unless you just put them there for reference. Scott #178 in use from 1875-79.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 08/18/2014 06:27 am
Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   06:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, other two for the colour reference from my collection, I place them closer to the subject for picture purpose. this postcard posted on 8th October 1877 so issues after this date no need to consider.

I hope you experts have more to share with me please.

I better get some sleep before I get mad. see you all in the morning.

cheers
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by randeni - 08/18/2014 07:32 am
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   07:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's color is listed in the Scott catalog as Vermilion; and what was that "wise crack" supposed to mean?


Quote:
"I hope you experts have more to share with me please. I better get some sleep before I get mad.."


Gee-whiz! I'm sorry, I thought I was being rather polite?

The date on your postal stationery is dated October 7th 1877 which correlates precisely with when they was in use.


edit: spelling error
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 08/18/2014 07:49 am
Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   08:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Pardon me for my poor English. I was exited when I saw the stamp and eager to see someone say yes its or no it isn't with enough supporting materials. Gee I am So Sorry If I rude to any one.

By the way I also found this image of #180 from an auction site

cheers

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by randeni - 08/18/2014 08:12 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   1:31 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
180 is a special printing that was issued without gum and was never used for postage. You do not have a 180.

Your stamp, if the date on the cover is correct, is a 178 (issued in 1875). The other two vermillion stamps are either 178 or 183, depending on paper type.

Brian
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Brian Riley
APS 223349
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 08/18/2014   2:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If the paper is relatively bright under long wave UV, the stamp would be a Continental Bank Note printing 178 on hard paper. If the paper is relatively dull under long wave UV, it would be the soft paper 183 American Bank Note (or late Continental) product. For comparison, use a common stamp like a 65 or 114 as a hard paper example or a Scott 210 or 213 as a soft paper example.

Clark
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 08/19/2014   04:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Special thanks to Clark and Brian as well as to others who helped me to identify this stamp.

Thank fellows, keep up the good work.

cheers

randeni
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 08/19/2014   04:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
look how white the stamp is compared to both 1.) the postal stationery card (notorious for staining stamps) and 2.) the example to it's immediate left (probably of soft paper). So that's why I said Scott #178 (hard paper). -Cheers
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 08/19/2014 04:27 am
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
Posted 08/19/2014   5:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mudhut1000 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What an interesting, colorful, informative and somewhat controversial topic and discussion! I appreciate these "What if it is, what if it's that, etc.

They make me think and go research the stamp/s in question, something I rarely did in the past.

Thank you all.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1942 Posts
Posted 09/02/2014   12:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add essayk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
N.B.
Can anyone recognize the bold numerical cancellation on the middle stamp.



I just happened across this thread and noticed that no one responded to your second question. The negative figure in a squared off block is most likely the figure "8" but could also be a "3". The easy part of the question is in referring to this as one of a large series of such cancels used in Boston, Massachusetts. The great authority on cancels of this type is still the magisterial work by Blake and Davis from 1949, ^Boston Postmarks to 1890^ (also Quarterman reprint from 1974). Based on comparisons with the illustrations in plate 100, your numeral cancel is either #1779 or #1787 for numerals 3 or 8 respectively. Either way, this marking was used from 1880-1882, so chances are most likely that the stamp bearing this cancel is on soft paper, making it a Scott #183.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 09/02/2014   5:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
essayk, that was lot of detailed information, thanks mate.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 09/03/2014   07:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That's brilliant essayk! I never thought to look at the cork as a possible dating tool. However the #183 wasn't in use in 1877 (please correct me if I'm mistaken please.) and issued in 1879. The date on the card is 1877 which, in my opinion, makes the #178 a better fit. I suppose we could put this to rest if we could see a scan of the stamp at a higher resolution.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 09/03/2014 07:08 am
Valued Member
Australia
26 Posts
Posted 09/04/2014   5:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add randeni to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think there is a misunderstanding, the two stamps on to the left side dose not belongs to the postcard. They are there to compare with the one on the card. So the middle stamp could be anywhere in between the mentioned period. I will try to post a clear scan soon.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 09/05/2014   02:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
randeni we are aware of the examples. -Cheers!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 4,472Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.53 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05