Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Controversy Over Maya Angelou Stamp Quote

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 9,779Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/06/2015   8:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
It seems the Washington Post has published an article suggesting that the quote on the Maya Angelou stamp to be issued on April 7, 2015 may not be correctly attributed to her:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...c_story.html

An "error" before the stamp even gets issued?

Some may find it to be an interesting topic of conversation, especially since the stamp correctly refers to her without the title "Dr." even though the FDOI cancels use the title "Dr." (Maya Angelou did not have a college degree; only honorary doctorates).

Send note to Staff

Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 04/06/2015   8:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Haste makes waste.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts
Posted 04/06/2015   10:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MeadowviewCollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
From what I recall, the recent oops from the USPS are

The stamp showing the Statue of Liberty from Vegas

Printing the Let's Move stamps then canceling the release

And now this one.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
911 Posts
Posted 04/06/2015   11:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add SPQR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There was also a recent controversy regarding the Korean War Memorial stamp, issued in 2002. A Federal appellate court recently affirmed a $540,000 judgment against the USPS for copyright infringement. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...n-war-stamp/
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
4788 Posts
Posted 04/07/2015   2:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add kirks to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is they're almost impossible to verify." --Abraham Lincoln
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/07/2015   2:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
More on the controversy is posted in this subsequent article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...a_story.html

Within the past few hours, the Washington Post article is also being recited in news carried by USA Today and CNN, among many others.

In essence, it has become an embarrassment for the USPS on the first day of issue for the new stamp, especially since the USPS has acknowledged that had they known about the true authorship of the quote, a different quote would have been used on the Maya Angelou Stamp.

It makes you wonder if the recently dropped rule about waiting a period of time before a new stamp gets issued would have uncovered the problem over time and avoided all of this unwanted publicity.

Sometime ago a radio station inaccurately reported that the Maya Angelou stamp would include the quote "Nothing Will Work Unless You Do". In hindsight, maybe that would have been a better quote to use (unless that gets attributed to someone else):

http://wzakcleveland.hellobeautiful...-usps-stamp/


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 04/07/2015 2:50 pm
Valued Member
United States
94 Posts
Posted 04/07/2015   6:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dekka37 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
My Father in Law always said you didn't have to travel the world. You could just go to Vegas. That is just funny that they would use the Statue of Liberty from Vegas. The Eiffel Tower is there too.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/07/2015   9:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here's a scathing commentary putting the blame solely on the shoulders of the USPS for the Maya Angelou stamp (mis)quote:


Quote:
That sound you hear is the echo of our collective facepalms because the level of this fail is so epic that I am embarrassed for everyone who had something to do with the production. Was good research busy? Was fact checking on vacation? Did diligence quit? What happened? How did this mistake come to be, USPS?

Did they use Pinterest to pull this quote or was it Instagram? Wikipedia University is not the best either, you know.

...

Unfortunately, the Postal Service's spokesman, Mark Saunders went into his bag of excuses and said: "Had we known about this issue beforehand, we would have used one of (Angelou's) many other works. … The sentence held great meaning for her and she is publicly identified with its popularity."

This is a STAMP, not a blogpost! This is something that people will buy and place in their valuables. This should have been vetted by multiple people, and the quote used should have been hers without a doubt! There should [have been] no room for error with this stamp.


http://thegrio.com/2015/04/07/posta...-stamp-fail/
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 04/07/2015 9:45 pm
Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 04/08/2015   07:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Perhaps the error will get the USPS to reconsider the wisdom of waiting a decade or so after someone's passing to put someone on a stamp. The rush to put her on a stamp was unseemly, and had all the markings of pandering to certain pc interests. Likely, no due diligence was done for the same reason.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3046 Posts
Posted 04/08/2015   10:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add apastuszak to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Let's not forget the "Athletes In Motion" stamp for the US Olympics that was never issued.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Free Ukrainian Stamp Album and modified Mystic Stamp Album Pages - http://www.stamphacks.com
Ukrainian Philatelic and Numismatic Society Member #1212: http://www.upns.org
Eire Philatelic Association Member #2869: http://www.eirephilatelicassoc.org/
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 04/13/2015   12:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
With all the media attention given to the mis(quote) on the Maya Angelou Stamp, I found this commentary rather interesting:

http://www.tricities.com/news/opini...a68b390.html

Note in particular the last three paragraphs:


Quote:
The misquote might make the postal service, and not Angelou, look like a twit. But it tarnishes the honor of having the portrait of the renowned poet on a stamp.

It sends the wrong message to millions of young people who need to know that proper attribution matters, the Internet can be a highly unreliable source and it's never too late to correct your mistakes.

A stamp isn't granite, and it need not be forever wrong. The postal service should quickly correct and reissue the stamp, with one of Angelou's original phrases.


Do you agree?

On one hand, I found it interesting that Linn's Stamp News readers supported the idea of recalling and replacing the Maya Angelou stamp with a more appropriate quote by more than a 2:1 margin.

On the other hand, the NY Times is reporting that the USPS has already decided they will not re-issue the stamp with a different quote.

Of course, if the stamp were to be re-issued, there would be an outcry from those feeling that the costs involved would be of concern, while there are those who feel the stamp in its present form will always be thought of as a "mistake" rather than a "tribute" to Maya Angelou.

Should this stamp be left alone and just let the media attention to it die off? Or should the USPS be compelled to re-issue the stamp with a more appropriate quote that can actually be attributed to Maya Angelou?

I'm curious about your thoughts.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
55 Posts
Posted 04/13/2015   9:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Neal Montgomery to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I heard on the news that the family of the person the quote is attributed to is not going to raise a concern about it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts
Posted 04/13/2015   9:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Alan B to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To be totally correct about this issue, the quote has been frequently attributed to Maya Angelou, not at all diminished by the fact that the title of the book that brought her much fame is "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings". The USPS was certainly not the first to incorrectly attribute the quote to her, and it is very unlikely they will be the last.

Alan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
48 Posts
Posted 04/14/2015   01:51 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add owsi15797 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The USPS was certainly not the first to incorrectly attribute the quote to her, and it is very unlikely they will be the last.


Despite the original author not pursuing copyright infringement, that doesn't make this right. Not only did they rush this stamp into production instead of waiting the traditional 10 years, they did not fully research her works to identify the quote. It is an embarrassment and indicative of a "facts don't matter, lets to something because it will make us feel good" attitude.

I just hope the USPS does a little more due diligence in the future.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1096 Posts
Posted 04/14/2015   03:52 am  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Being that the U.S. Postal Service issues new stamps every year, it would not be an extra postal burden to plan and release a new stamp that includes a quote that can be attributed to Maya Angelou. It would only be a matter of priority and sense of right thing to do. Maybe they will figure this out and do it in 9 years...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1847 Posts
Posted 04/14/2015   09:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cjpalermo1964 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Should this stamp be left alone and just let the media attention to it die off?


This is what will happen, regardless of whether it should. Our present government is not in the habit of admitting its mistakes. Instead, the standard response is to attack the critics, then change the subject.

Compounding the amusement is the article in this week's Linn's suggesting that errors are just part of the normal stamp production process.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 9,779Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05