Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Canada 1360n 'Snowflake Variety'

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,697Next Topic  
Valued Member

Canada
77 Posts
Posted 04/29/2015   4:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add medoc to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I had the good fortune of purchasing a booklet of Canada 1360n stamps in ~1995 that included the so-called 'snowflake variety'. The scan below shows the 2 stamps out of the booklet with the 'snowflakes'.

My 2000 Unitrade Specialized Catalogue of Canadian Stamps says on p.321 "The so-called 'snowstorm' variety: When some booklets are opened, Stray spots of glue on the cover adhere to the printed face of the stamps. Ink is removed by the glue, leaving spots of 'snow'. These are damaged stamps."

I agree that these stamps are not a variety as the 'snowflakes' are not in constant positions on the stamps, but are rather positioned randomly on the stamps (as snowflakes should be ). However, I disagree with characterizing them as damaged stamps. As far as I am aware, no other Canadian stamps are known to have the same problem. I would rather characterize the stamps as errors, the error resulting from the stray spots of glue on the inside of the booklet cover. In my opinion, this is a situation similar to misprinted stamps due to folds or other paper problems - those are not referred to as damaged stamps, but rather as errors.

What are your thoughts on this question?

Send note to Staff

Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 04/29/2015   7:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I disagree with characterizing them as damaged stamps


Hi medoc..Let me ask you this..if a large queen had glue dripped on it, would you call it an error or a damaged stamp..?

Something to think about...

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wert - 04/29/2015 7:52 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
572 Posts
Posted 04/29/2015   8:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Freibergs to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Define error though. Is it just misprints and misperfs or do we include other things such as packaging errors in booklets such as above? Anything but a pristine, as designed stamp, could qualify as damaged.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,697Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05