Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

How Much Perf Damage Is OK On Large Queens?

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 35 / Views: 4,380Next Topic
Page: of 3
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 07/10/2015   7:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
.....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
728 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   08:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjung to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The reason that some Large Queens have poor perfs is because of the paper they were printed on. I'm talking specifically of the Bothwell Paper (Duckworths Paper 6) that has the watermark. This paper was poor quality and generally has poor perfs. And this is one way to spot them.

Now there were many different paper types used to print the LQ's. If you get one on the good papers, it will have decent perfs. This one seems ok except the left side.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Canada
84 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   09:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hutin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SUPERB #27 jimjung ; MINE the cancel is quite heavy but the centering is perfect
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   12:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
jimjung...I have noticed that a lot of #27 have a smaller margin on the left side as shown on my stamp below also.

Robert


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1415 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   12:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gilles le timbre to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Jim, Wert, of my 10 number 27, only 1 has F/VF centering. This one also has a red cancel. Any guess at what the cancel is? (I see the letters DON)

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Gilles le timbre - 07/11/2015 12:51 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   2:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chipg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
some 6c large queens:
top row: dark brown, yellow brown, black brown, brown
bottom row: re-entry, re-entry, soft blotting paper

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
644 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   3:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 3Dadeo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
GIlles, yours looks like part of a "PAID" bank cancel (fiscal)
Possibly "LONDON" - pretty early use.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by 3Dadeo - 07/11/2015 3:37 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
728 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   4:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjung to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gilles, I think your LONDON PAID postmark might look like this. The date is in the Large Queen period (1871).



chip - your Black Brown is particularly nice, especially with the 1868 date. LQ`s are tough to find with the date so nice. And the early date supports the 1st Printing Black Brown of the 6c.

I looked at some of my 6c LQ`s and I did find alot centered to the left. I do have them centered to the right also. Honestly, I have alot of LQ`s. Here is a nicely centered vertical pair of the 6c. The LQ`s was the first issue that I created a collection for just one issue of stamps.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jimjung - 07/11/2015 5:09 pm
Valued Member
Canada
84 Posts
Posted 07/11/2015   7:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hutin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
chipg has the best selection of #27
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   12:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chipg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is not a competition
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   09:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
644 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   10:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 3Dadeo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If you had to chose, which is most important to you (ie. what do you look at first)?

Perforations, Centering, Cancel

I always look at the perfs first, then cancel, and lastly the centering. The perfs have to be good first before I look at the rest, but that's my preference (I'm probably in the minority). What is yours?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by 3Dadeo - 07/12/2015 10:30 am
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1415 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   10:31 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gilles le timbre to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Centering, then cancel then perf.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   11:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Perforations, Centering, Cancel


All of the above...

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts
Posted 07/12/2015   11:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tlmcca to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If you had to chose, which is most important to you (ie. what do you look at first)?


3Dadeo: My preference would be centering. Cancellation is second and if it obliterates the face of the stamp it would out weigh perfect centering.

Terry
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 35 / Views: 4,380Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05