Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Question Regarding Mint Stamps

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,470Next Topic  
New Member

United States
1 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   11:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rholmes376 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I am just starting to catalog my German Collection and have several stamps that look like they are mint (no cancellation marks on front of stamp) however the gum on the back has been removed.

Are these still considered Mint?

Also if you use a watermark fluid to see what watermark you have, does that remove the gum from the stamp?

Randy
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
3169 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   12:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If the gum is missing from an otherwise mint stamp, (That is un-used, not canceled) it is then call un-used, Mint means "as if came from the printer/post office".

Watermark Fluid will NOT remove the gum.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1515 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   12:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jenny2U to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Keep in mind that some Third Reich stamps were issued with gum which included a small amount of acid, so the gum would be removed to protect the stamps. For these stamps (such as the 1936 Hindenburg issue), Scott's unused values are for stamps without gum.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   12:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rholmes376, welcome to this forum. There are other possibilities for stamps to have no gum. One of the main ones would be that they were used but not cancelled. The above reasons are also very good, so it is imperative that you be a little more precise about what stamps you are talking about. A scan is always better, a picture is worth etc.....!

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Canada
14 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   1:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fbissonn to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There was a time until around 1930, philatelists remove the gum from the mint stamps to avoid their stamps stick together in their albums.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by fbissonn - 08/06/2015 07:48 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3169 Posts
Posted 08/05/2015   2:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Are these still considered Mint?


As you can see, there are no simple answers to your simple question, but "it depends" isn't much of an answer.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,470Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05