Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Rating A 1937 Airmail Special Delivery Cover

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,150Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community

United States
848 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   11:10 am  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add paperhistory to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Need little help rating this one out. 1937 airmail special delivery, Sandusky OH to Hungary. Airmail should have been 8 cents (assuming domestic airmail service and surface carriage thereafter). Sender appears to have made a mistake, affixing domestic airmail (6 cents) and UPU surface rate (5 cents). But special delivery was 20 cents, not 10 cents. So it looks to me that full postage should have been 28 cents - the cover is 7 cents short. But only 30 centimes in postage due instead of 35.

Compounding the problem, there is a "not in special delivery" marking from NY, so it's not clear if special delivery service was actually provided (or, for that matter, why, since it's going overseas, it would have been segregated as special delivery mail at or before reaching NY).

As one final question mark, I understand the Hungarian auxiliary marking to refer to items received by airmail, but the cover wasn't endorsed for it. It does, however, have a French backstamp, so perhaps it received this service.

I can't quite make it add up, with or without the special delivery service or the in-continent airmail service. Anyone have an idea?



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2423 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   12:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGB to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Victor von Baden would not have been above using too little postage.

"Von Baden Gets Federal Term TOLEDO, O., Jan. 28 [1941] (UPI) Victor Von Baden, president of the Mon Ami Champagne Co., Port Clinton, O., today was sentenced to imprisonment by Judge Frank L. Kloeb of federal district court on charges of conspiracy and violation of the federal alcohol laws pertaining to wineries. On the conspiracy charge, Von Baden was sentenced to two years. On the other charge he was sentenced to two years and two and a half months. Last October Von Baden was sentenced to two and a half years and fined $1,600 on the charge of violating the alcohol tax laws."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
628 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   1:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jim6092252 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
See why you should never send a letter, 80 years from now someone might get the envelope and do a criminal background check on you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
848 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   1:26 pm  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add paperhistory to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
KGB: Yes indeed. I'm in the process of writing this cover up (for the Ohio Postal History Journal, and perhaps one or more of the revenue organizations), and I grabbed a whole file of newspaper articles on the 1940-41 court case. [side note: the revenue folks I've consulted with have never seen a Mon Ami cancel on a wine revenue].

The Mon Ami facility in Catawba Island (which was originally built in the early 1870s by a different company) is now a restaurant and it still sells wines under its own label. I had a bottle Saturday night. [Like most Ohio wines, it's a Catawba, light and sweet, which is not my typical taste in wine].



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2423 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   1:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGB to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
paper, very neat! Good luck with the write up.

By the way, is the large T and N.Y. (?) related to the postage due?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1270 Posts
Posted 09/28/2015   10:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I see Ken L. never got back with you on this one. He may have forgotten to do so. You may want to e-mail him? He's probably as good a source for the answers as anyone.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,150Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05