Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help Needed: Has The Gum Been Partially Sweated & Smoothed?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,863Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts
Posted 11/21/2015   6:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add shermae to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
The stamp whose reverse is pictured below is a 100R definitive from Iran issued in 1958 or 1959. I realize the production quality of a stamp from Iran during this era is somewhat marginal so I have reasonable expectations. That said, there is any area in the lower-right portion of the gum affecting abut 20% of the surface that seems to indicate the stamp was subjected to sweating and smoothing at some point.

The area is not a typical area for hinging, and the rest of the set is MNH. The gum has a strong element of horizontal striations which are interrupted in the area in question. This kind of attribute is exceedingly difficult to image, so I have provided a series of pics for examination.

Do you think this gum on this stamp has been sweated and smoothed, or is it more likely an artifact of storage?















P.S. - For some reason several of these photos lost a lot of resolution but the image second from the top best illustrates my concern.
Send note to Staff
Edited by shermae - 11/21/2015 6:31 pm

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1951 Posts
Posted 11/21/2015   6:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Shermae,

It does not appear to be sweated and resmoothed to me. But it does looked damaged from heat or moisture.

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2423 Posts
Posted 11/21/2015   7:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGB to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Damaged, I suppose, but I hope that wouldn't lessen the value of the stamp for you.

Admission: I don't pay much attention to gum.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts
Posted 11/21/2015   8:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Hal to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with Jack Kelley's assessment.

Hal
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6345 Posts
Posted 11/21/2015   9:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a wet fingerprint impression. I can just imagine the postal clerk wetting his finger to help separate the next sheet of stamps off the stack for a customer ....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts
Posted 11/22/2015   10:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rwoodennickel to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have seen gummed stamps look like this when stored in glassines in a humid environment. They were partially stuck to surface. That does not account for the "finger" splotch though.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8514 Posts
Posted 11/22/2015   12:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Have to agree with Jack K , it looks like dampness effecting a glassine .
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts
Posted 11/22/2015   4:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add shermae to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think Jack nailed it- gum damage caused by moisture and/or heat. My mind tends to run towards nefarious motives for flaws, probably because of frustration caused when sellers must know there is an obvious, glaring gum flaw. I was not aware that stamps damaged in glassines might have this sort of pattern, so this was a very nice tip to learn. Although there appears to be a partial finger print on the gum, I think it's actually the horizontal striations becoming randomized after the gum became moistened.

Thank you for all the help and new learnings, this one is going back to the seller.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4122 Posts
Posted 11/22/2015   10:13 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The area is not a typical area for hinging


Sometimes a block of 4 is hinged in the middle, and so once separated from the block the 4 singles will all have a hinge mark in a corner. Not saying that happened here, but it is something to be careful of when buying "NH" stamps - you can't just look at the top middle.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,863Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05