Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Question For The Postal Stationery That Present In Thematic Exhibition

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,342Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
67 Posts
Posted 09/11/2016   2:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add valjean to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Let's use private stationery of Bayern as an example.
Is there any rule to say that it's better to use used private stationery for thematic exhibit,or it doesn't matter wether it's unused or used?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
568 Posts
Posted 09/11/2016   5:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Anthraquinone to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There is probably on rule as such although individual competitions may have some.

Are the rest of the items mint or used
Does the postal marking add to the story in any way
Is mint or used much rarer one way or another and does that matter

I am sure that there are other considerations I have not thought of.

AQ
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1160 Posts
Posted 09/12/2016   09:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add PoStat4evR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I,first of all, do not exhibit my postal stationery, but find that both unused and used have their place in exhibitions. If, for example, you are showing the trend of a particular country in what they issued over a period of time, unused would seem to be the way to go, as they are usually in better shape physically. If you have some exhibit based on usage of a particular region, I would suppose used would be the way to go. I would think a combined display with say Bayern beginning of issue to say 1900, with examples both unused and used tied together would be a way to go.
There are subsets you could go off on, like Railway Post Offices or Travelling Post Offices with examples and maps that the cancelled (used) stationery cancels would show. Or, if you wanted to show a particular subject (king or other subjects) a mint collection with a smattering of used would work.
The object of exhibits is to show something specific in a limited number of frames. The more complete the subject, the more "points" you earn.
I hope this may have helped. I tend to ramble. Good luck.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
849 Posts
Posted 09/12/2016   09:59 am  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add paperhistory to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The general rule in thematics is that mint is preferred to used, at least for stamps. It isn't as explicit for stationery but unless the postal markings themselves further the topic, mint is probably better.

I'd note that the use of private stationery in a thematic might be questioned in the first instance under the judging manual. But this may be a definitional issue - if it's stationery that was prepared by the government by personal order, it would be OK. If it's something purely privately produced "after market" I don't think you could rely on the privately prepared portion as a thematic element. (for the same reason that first day cover cachets aren't considered thematic elements).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
67 Posts
Posted 09/12/2016   10:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add valjean to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks friends,very helpful
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,342Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05