Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Revenue Acquisitions From Chicagopex (Many Images)

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 3,410Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6433 Posts
Posted 11/27/2016   2:29 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Time to showcase the goodies I picked up at Chicagopex last weekend. Not all of these were purchased, as we had a lively trading session Friday night. A wide variety of items, from cancels to illegal usages to plate varieties.

Let's start off with some documents...

These first three were a last-second purchase on Sunday; dealer Denny Peoples had purchased a bulk lot over the weekend and I picked out these three because they have local interest for me, all are Champaign, IL usages. The first appears to have a minor double transfer at bottom (see bottom of S, I, and N).













An Adams Express Co. document taxed as a receipt, not the earlier express tax...




... whereas this one is paying an Express tax, a nice EMU (early matching usage).




A 1-cent Telegraph (R4c) paying a one-cent rate, which are not exactly common.




An R51c used on document. A slightly better stamp, cataloguing $60.00.




Some court documents that provide attribution for some well-known cancels.








A pair of documents that showcase extreme sulphurization; being stored in close proximity to sulphur coal is likely the culprit.






Part of another coal company document...




Some miscellaneous and sundry documents...














More miscellany.








An underpaid tax (should be 2 cents) on a receipt for a set of grave stones.




A numerical processing handstamp.




A nice plate number single with a socked on the nose cancel...




... and another plate number single.




Some CDVs, including a nice mixed perf and imperf usage. The last one is interesting, not so much philatelically but rather the subjects of the photo and the poem on the reverse.










Some railroad documents...












An unusual lightning rod insurance policy.




A couple of maritime-related documents. The first a receipt for newspaper adveritising of a steamer, and the second with both steamboat and railroad ties.






A very unusual cancellation method... with... white out?




A wonderful large-format circular handstamp from Goodyear's India Rubber Manufacturing Co., a which later became what we know as Good Year Tire Co.




A great railroad steel die handstamp cancel, unlisted in Tolman. A very late usage for a steel die; most were ribbon handstamps by this point.




Now on to cancels...
















































A mangled example of a very scarce playing card co. printed cancel (findable in black or blue, but very scarce in red).




Unusual design, perhaps a roller cancel of some sort?




Possibly the initials of all of the signatories? Without context, we'll likely never know.




Abysmal quality control. Printed cancel completely mis-positioned.




A meticulous manuscript approximation of a single-line handstamp cancel.




Presumably a "TO BE GAUGED" single-line handstamp, with the last word misspelled.






Unusual ship chandler cancel.




Printed medicine co. cancel.




Another medicine cancel.






Canadian handstamp cancel (any Canadian cancels are very scarce).




Not a cancel, but rather a provisional Future Delivery overprint. Not listed in Scott, but well known in the revenue collecting community.




And lastly a railroad handstamp cancel on the 4-cent Playing Cards, a tough combination. Sadly badly thinned, but aesthetically pleasing nonetheless.




Now on to plate varieties, inking anomalies, etc.


Horrible quality control on this one; barely recognizable.




A double transfer, muddy print though.






Double transfer at lower left in CE of CERTIFICATE.




Doubling of frame lines at top and bottom.




Vertical 2-cent Bank Check pair with plate scratch crossing both stamps.




One of the several variants of the T15 major double transfer...




... and one on document.




Cut cancel, but a ncie example of the double transfer across the top.






Very similar to the T15a major double transfer, but more dramatic and in additional places. There are other DTs on R15c that are more bold, but this one has greater spacing between the primary elements and the doubled ones than I've seen before.




R120 foreign entry. I have several other examples, but this is the only reported example on document.




R18e double impression. It's not as clean of an impression as the other double impressions I have, but the green is known for muddy impressions. Doing some research, I can find only 5 sales of R18e over the last 25 years at auction, but those 5 sales comprise a total of 2 different stamps: this one which has been sold at auction 3 times, and one other stamp with straight edge at top that has been sold twice. Very scarce.




Now some illegal/improper usages. Unlike in other countries, uses of U.S. postage stamps for revenue purposes and the reverse were not legal.

First, one that while not a revenue illegal usage, struck my fancy. I assume the Philippines overprinted stamps were not legal for domestic use.




A modern improper commercial (nonphilatelic) usage on post card. Nonphilatelic modern usages are very uncommon.




A bevy of battleships used as postage on cover, most used in period.














A later usage. Note that it took 2 weeks to be re-sent after postage was paid.




This one is used long out of period, but it has great markings and most 1st issue revenues that are used as postage in period have crappy aesthetics (beat up, indistinguishable cork killer cancels, etc.).




A 2-cent Trans-Missippi used as revenue on check.




I wish the original document for this one was still intact.




This one is very unusual. Several revenue specialists and dealers were unable to figure out the usage. It's too odd and haphazard to be contrived; everyone who looked at it believes it to be legitimate, but it doesn't match the tax rate tables. The postage stamps were affixed AFTER the revenue stamps, so it's not a matter of the improper usage being discovered and then paid. Additionally, the revenue stamps total 4 cents, whereas the postage stamps total 6 cents paid. The mathematical tabulation on the reverse is exactly double the document amount on the front. Some speculated that there may have been a secondary document attached and the 10 cent total was improperly paying the tax on both transactions. Another supposition was that it might be for a penal bond (one amount if paid before a certain date, and a penalty kicked in after that date). Any ideas?




Improper use of a block of 4 of the 2.5-cent Proprietary battleship paying the 10-cent tax on a marriage certificate. I thought the document itself looked familiar, and it happens to be the exact same type of marriage certificate and in same county as another illegal usage I have, of a 10-cent Trans-Missippi, with the ceremony conducted the same day and certificate dated 6 days earlier (shown below). The proximity and similarity of improper usages actually help corroborate one another as authentic.






Illegal usage of 4 Washington-Franklins as revenue stamps on an American Express Co. ledger page. Eric Jackson had a small hoard of about a dozen of them, and many still remain if anyone is interested.




Another illegal usage of a Washington-Franklin as revenue, this one lovely due to its aesthetics. The user meticulously inscribed "Used as USIR for lack of Rev. Stamp" on the stamp in red.




This one is aesthetically beautiful IMO, as well as being doubly scarce. It not only is an improper use of a proprietary stamp as a documentary, but also has German revenue stamps affixed to the back. Combination usage of U.S. and non-U.S. revenues from this era are very scarce.




And lastly, some additions to my sewing machine perforation collection...

A lovely example of R115a. Nice margins and perfectly sound.




A pair of R112b, also sound. Multiples are not particularly common.




And finally one, that while a bit beat up, is definitely legit. RB3a. While the sewing machine perfs are only visible on the bottom side, they perf out correctly, and if someone were going to manufacture one, they would not have just made perfs along one side. Additionally, the position of the vignette compared to the frame is virtually identical to that of the other example I own (shown below). Much more scarce than the $650 catalog value would imply.




Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
5460 Posts
Posted 11/27/2016   2:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add redwoodrandy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great showing. Good fun. Enjoy everyone.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 11/27/2016   3:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Richard said that he would pay me $100 if I got you to buy that double impression, so now I have to collect (he was kidding of course). :-)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
132 Posts
Posted 11/28/2016   8:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add colonelrklink to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
thanks for the post of items and the tidbits of information. I appreciate it not only for the stamps but the wisdom I gain from seeing and understanding why something is what it is.

Thank you for your time and effort into this

colonel
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 11/28/2016   9:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think I have now figured out the promissory note for MP Ayers. The original date of the document is July 1, 1864, but payable on September 15, 1864 (77 days). I think they miscounted the days involved. At that time the rate for 33 to 63 days was 2 cents per $200 or fraction, and the rate for 63 to 93 days was 3 cents per $200 or fraction. However on August 1, 1864 the rates changed to a flat rate of 5 cents per $200 or fraction. Since the money was paid after the rate changed, the document was now subject to the additional tax. Since the note was being held at that time by the lender, there was no one to notice the shortfall anyway, just as there was no one to notice the postage stamps used when the rate changed. Only if it became part of a legal case would it be noticed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 11/28/2016   9:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The thought also occurs to me that this note was only one month before the tax rate change. Perhaps there were rumors of a rate change, and that they might even go down (some rates had already done so).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
770 Posts
Posted 11/28/2016   11:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add southpaw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice pickups. Looks like fun I may need to drive up from NC next year.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6433 Posts
Posted 11/29/2016   08:37 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Good thoughts Bart, but according to Mahler's rate tables, the August 1, 1864 rate change was to 5 cents per $100 or fraction, not per $200 that the prior rate entailed, which would have made the tax due on this transaction fifteen cents, not ten.

And the hunt continues...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 11/29/2016   09:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Apparently I can't read; I was looking at the book as I wrote this.
The only other possibility is that it has something to do with the back of the instrument and the fact that it was paid to multiple people. The first underpaid it, and the second paid the old rate correctly but in postage stamps. And the new rate was ignored.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
253 Posts
Posted 12/02/2016   3:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add clifhiker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have to admit that the photo of the 'little people' took me aback for a minute ... said something like "oh my gosh what ugly kids!" Til I read the poem.

Nice collection!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 12/02/2016   9:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
When I bought that photo (I traded it to Dan in Chicago), it was described on ebay as a photo of kids. I recognized them as little people immediately, but had to look them up to discover exactly who they were.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 3,410Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05