| Author |
Replies: 497 / Views: 38,622 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3291 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
My pleasure, Rod222 and Bobby De La Rue. That numeral, however, is likely to remain a mystery! |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 12/23/2022 05:18 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Stop it! Stop it! This is crazy  Oh! my goodness, how marvellous is that ? Take a bow, Fairdinkum stamps. Thanks so much. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3291 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
Another Tatts piece with halfpenny stamps - this time from Greta, 53 km WNW of Newcastle.  |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 01/02/2023 04:19 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
This one is interesting - the closest I can find after a quick look at Freeman's 'The Numeral Cancellations of New South Wales' is 391(1) Kembla, rated RRRR. I also see the possibility of the last digit being '0'.   |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 01/04/2023 06:48 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I would support 391 Would that be a steel / brass hammer? What would the marginal marking read FDS? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3291 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
Rod222, the marginal inscription is part of 'DIAMOND JUBILEE POSTAGE STAMPS - PRICE: 2d. per label 1s. per row of six etc. Bobby De La Rue, The date of closure of Kembla certainly doesn't match the stamp issue date but the numeral itself appears to be a good match for the Kembla example shown by Hugh Freeman:  |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 01/04/2023 7:38 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thank you. Impressive image work!
The Star v Barred format raises questions and the state of the impression would tend it toward a rubber railway device?
I find it hard to imagine a steel or brass postal hammer degrading to that extent.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/04/2023 7:15 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
What numbers did NSW numerals reach please? I have a boxed and barred numeral 1204 image ( Not sure if it is mine)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
928 Posts |
|
|
Rod222, Hugh Freeman lists New South Wales numerals up to 2100, although the highest seen is 2099.
He speculates that Victoria 'copied the logic of finishing the series at 2100' from New South Wales. |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Interesting. Thankyou. I have 60 Diamond Jubilee stamps, and perhaps 4-5 have readable Pmks The general impressions are of worn and smudgy duplexes, or barred killers. Just a few stars.
I still see 391 or 166
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/04/2023 10:00 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3291 Posts |
|
|
I had another look at this on my phone while I was in town, which gave me a different perspective.
My initial thought (Qld Railway Cancel) was based on what look like parallel horizontal lines under the numeral (see the second image).
The imperf diadem stamp in Hugh's book couldn't have been used at Kembla, and it's not a 391. It's a poorly inked 68 or 88.
I'm pretty sure the cancellation is a well worn 168 of Bodalla.
Rod, the devices were made of soft metal and wore easily.
Victoria went to number 2100 to trump NSW, not to equal them, intercolonial rivalries being what they were, and still are to an extent. They issued numerals to 1906, two years after NSW ceased. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Bobby De La Rue - 01/04/2023 10:24 pm |
|
Replies: 497 / Views: 38,622 |
|