Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

I Need Help Id'ing A France/Reunion Stamp

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,806Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
6 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   10:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add NEK Stamps to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I cannot find a Scott Cat. No. for this stamp which appears to be France Scott #55 with a Reunion surcharge/overprint. Any help would be appreciated.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8578 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   11:24 am  Show Profile Check GeoffHa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add GeoffHa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Second attempt at this. Is this manufactured by surcharging an already cancelled stamp?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by GeoffHa - 12/08/2017 11:28 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3210 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   11:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG 5 should be 5c / 10c imperf.

This doesn't look right to me, either the shape of the surcharge or that it's on a stamp with an 1895 postmark.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8578 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   11:29 am  Show Profile Check GeoffHa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add GeoffHa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nigel - yes, sorry, brain not in gear!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3210 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   11:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No problem - easily done.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8399 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   12:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a fake overprint to me . The "R" looks poor .
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8399 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   12:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Notice the better quality of the overprint especially the "R"
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3210 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   1:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice stamp floortrader.

Yes, the surcharge is much neater.

It's also one of the appropriate stamps and has an 1886 postmark.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts
Posted 12/08/2017   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NEK Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree that floortrader's "R" is much neater, but when I look at the "5c. R" Reunion overprints on HipStamp, Stamps2Go and ebay, I see that mine is pretty much in the middle, neatness-wise.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 12/09/2017   05:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Compare with this:

Each is signed Brun, a well-known expert. Compare the upright part of the "5", the shading of the bottom curve of the "5" and of course the shape of the "R".

Also see all the 5c surcharges here:
http://www.typesage.fr/articles/reu...e_surcharge/
Same typeface as the block above for all.

Unfortunately, close examination of the 5c on 10c here seems to show the overprint was drawn in outline and filled in. The genuine have printed surcharges. Sorry.

An 1895 cancel doesn't make sense for this. No chance to drag out a 10 year old stamp from an issue that was probably sold out by the time the diagonal overprints were made in 1891. This could be a French cancel, meaning probably not legitimate usage unless maybe from a port city. It's still unclear whether it is over or under the overprint, but the surcharge is all wrong regardless
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,806Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05